-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2006/09/12/dunn-apologizes-and-steps-down-from-hp-board/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
2 weeks ago · 181 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
3 days ago · 24 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
2 days ago · 8 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
Sometimes there are shareholder actions to intervene -- Disney and HP had those, remember -- but that usually involves getting together a lot of proxies somehow. I don't see that as very likely in this instance.
I suppose indictments would cause removals, but we are not going to know about that for a while, and it might not touch the board either.
I find it interesting that leaking doesn't have more-serious sanctions in this case. It's not just like someone violating an NDA, it is more like breaching confidentiality about business and market information. The SEC would have a concern about how that could end up impacting trading and stock prices, which is why, I imagine, that the fact of the leaking had to be disclosed to the SEC in one of HPs reports.
At the same time, I do not condone the approach that was taken to identify and halt the leakage.
No, they won't both be on the board at the same time. That's from the links in Google news that you linked to, by the way.
They were all part of this.
This is why Ford, GM, Lucent and AT&T took their eye off the ball, their Board members know more about fine wine then any technology.
The HP Board is much like Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI their having a great time as the company downsizes.
I don't mean to be rude, but all you US guys so upset about the privacy implications should pay mind to what your government has been doing since 9/11. And you should probably start routinely encrypting ALL communications of importance with heavy-duty crypto.
Notice the use of the plural PEOPLE...
Gotta pressy source saying Lockyer is going to the mat on this, he wants to Eliot Spitzer himself. If you are sick of the coverage already, prepare to be even sicker...and then some. Spizter and Lockyer did that joint Microsoft statement, it kinda went fizzle, given the next 24 hours.
http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2001/sep/sep10... - Notice the date.
But point being, Spitzer and Lockyer are joint at the hip on a number of issues.
"I don’t mean to be rude, but all you US guys so upset about the privacy implications should pay mind to what your government has been doing since 9/11. And you should probably start routinely encrypting ALL communications of importance with heavy-duty crypto."
Yes, you are right about that. Unfortunately there will come a time when just having encrypted data will be enough to call a person a terrorist and hold them indefinitely without charging them first. My understanding is that's already the case in Britain.
thanks for responding (I was diving in Malaysia so didn't catch your comment until now). If you ever read this thread (cocomment user?), would you mind expanding on the Britain point?