<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/developers_the_best_smart_phone_platform_is/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:51:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21942528</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course, there are less downloads on Windows Mobile, but have many Jar, I think all smart phone accept it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wholesale kids clothing</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:51:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21698876</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a fair assumption judging that you are taking into account the US market only.&lt;br&gt;There is, however a fairly big piece of the pie in Europe, where stats can be slightly different.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the case study though. Wonder if US people really use RIM devices for business rather then vanity as they tend to do here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val Vlădescu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:04:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21687571</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I took a look at the numbers a bit further in this post: "Earning a Living as an Independent Mobile Software Developer" &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/Zud8u" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/Zud8u"&gt;http://bit.ly/Zud8u&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justine Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:22:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21653541</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I mean that Apple and RIM do not have the resources to compete against the manufacturers of televisions, cars, cameras, home/office appliances, and new types of embedded devices on their turf when the manufacturers can simply adopt Android with no investment in recreating a system like Android which has a developer ecosystem already in place. These verticals are not in the OS business. However, Android is very easy to adapt to their devices with relatively very little cost to them considering their other options. Why would these companies hand over a significant portion of their profits to Apple or RIM if they did not have to? Microsoft is losing a ton of money on the XBox. Apple is failing with their AppleTV product. I doubt they will be entering into the automobile business anytime soon. I'm betting on Android as a commodity and that open with the backing of industry will beat closed for embedded operating systems. The evidence is substantial. The industry leader, Symbian, has even realized this. IMO Linux has been held back by the GPL license which is not business-friendly. Android is licensed under Apache 2.0 which is similar to the BSD license. BTW, Apple's OS is built on top of BSD Unix.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:14:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21653429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely, and he's so good at it. Scoble is the golden drama queen of the Tech world.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Apostol Apostolov</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:05:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21653400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I will just name couple things my iPod Touch can do only with jailbreaking and Cydia apps. On Android similar apps require no modification of the OS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;* My iPod has a dynamic lockscreen (app is LockInfo) showing the weather, RSS, calendar items and latest mail. Android has it and its called FlyScreen, too.&lt;br&gt;* My iPod has a Growl-like notification engine that shows latest email, calendar and alarm events etc. in any application. It's called GRiP. &lt;br&gt;* My iPod has a QTweeter app which opens from anywhere (home or application) and allows me to send a status to both Twitter and Facebook.&lt;br&gt;* My iPod has backgrounding through Backgrounder, and has easy to use task manager for switching between apps called Kurakae.&lt;br&gt;* My iPod has folders for apps. Android has 3rd party Launchers that add categories, folders, tagging and dynamic folders (smart folders based on tags) for apps.&lt;br&gt;* My iPod has SBSettings for changing device settings from within any app. &lt;br&gt;* My iPod changes its settings depending on the WiFi network it is connected. Android has Locale, a super-powerful automation app that can do anything depending on time, location and more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Okay, BF, its your turn to prove to me that it's just up to developers to come up with these apps on iPhone. You cannot. It's not up to iPhone developers. It's up to Apple to release their iron grip on the device which they won't. Android simply allows creation of thremendous amount of apps and services that are not constrained by the narrow thinking enforced by Cupertino. You and everyone else who thinks iPhone is the Jesus phone simply are entrenched in narrow-minded thinking when it comes to applications - you just envision simple, one-app-at-a-time, no-inter-app-interoperability, no-backgrounding, no-anything-innovative sort of apps.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Apostol Apostolov</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:04:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21652279</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not necessarily. This all comes down the app economy, not platform culture. If Android apps are to make money from less sales they would require higher prices, therefore people would stay away from "snacking" apps. In a year, when the market is flooded with 20+m Android phones, Android apps would find themselves in the same price ranges of iPhone apps, racing for the bottom, and people would get back to snacking apps again. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Apostol Apostolov</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:03:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21651818</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nickolay, the difference in using HTML/JS to develop on WebOS and Android is that on WebOS the browser is the operating system and it is always on and available; on Android your app would have to load the browser to utilize it which would be counterproductive considering Java and native C/C++ programming will be always faster. So work done on WebOS will not produce similar performance results in other operating systems. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Apostol Apostolov</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:01:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21620514</link><description>&lt;p&gt;1%?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Probably not. Phone calling has been seriously marginalized by texting, surfing, facebook, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:25:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21606560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd like to see these sorts of stats on a more global application. Pandora is limited to the US so it's obvious that the stats will be skewed towards US centric phones.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you could pry the numbers from Nimbuzz or Fring that would be way more telling. Although I suspect Apple will still come out on top. Not necessarily because more people will use your app but iphone users have become used to "snacking" on apps. That is downloading them, trying them and discarding or not using them. Users of other phones tend to be more careful about their decisions especially if they have to pay.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kimble</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:51:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21606429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder how many of Tim's download numbers are from repeat customers who are forced to carry a second mobile phone because iPhones aren't reliable as phones (I know, blame ATT.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was thinking of writing an app for iPhone to enable customers to make and receive phone calls....what do you think?  Could be huge, right? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anngreenberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:45:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21577886</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"hundreds of apps that are impossible for iPhone (except jailbroken and heavily pumped with Cydia goodness) and you're totally missing out."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why? I don't see much that iPhone or Android are impossible to do. It's only a matter of if those companies want to do it. Its like every few years people have to gather into cults, shout at each other "My dad is better than your". Certainly "best" means different things to different developers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bf</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:00:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21566734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree! I really fine Palm creative and useful for people who are always on the go.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bedroom dresser</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:05:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21564985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Scobleizer Very interesting as to the # of downloads. Those are nominal numbers. Would be interesting to know what the market share of Blackberry vs. iPhone. Despite Droid not being the iPhone-killer, it is a great next step and give Verizon's better coverage than AT&amp;amp;T across much of the US, that sacrifice may well be worth it for me. #mobile&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Archambault</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:43:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21561077</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course there are less downloads on Windows Mobile; only device that Pandora works on where there is no free option.  Why would I pay for it if iPhones get it free?  How does that even remotely make sense to do?  I am not going to subsidize iPhones taking all the bandwidth, sorry.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe McGrath</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:02:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21559849</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Nikolay, you sound a lot like the people who were saying in the early days of Java/Application servers that Java was a nice little toy for building applets but for building real server side logic, you need C++. Let's meet in 5 years and see if devices will be programmed using Open Web or some type of obscure third-party proprietary framework.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Edwin Khodabakchian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:52:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21556816</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It sounds great to all lazy developers, but the reality is that the mobile devices are quite different - performance, energy efficiency, and other things start to play a major role. At the end, the HTML/CSS ideas are part of the Android platform as well, but to build a lightweight apps or services, you don't need a browser. Also, Android comes with an NDK now, which allows you to develop native services, when performance, hardware drivers, and other things become critical, and I'm not sure if webOS has something similar.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nikolay Kolev</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:46:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21555334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Scoble does it b/c he wants to polarize and have dumb ppl like us to either tag it, digg it and/or comment and thereby create $$$/followers for him.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vlad</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:17:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21546480</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Who cares about downloads. How about usage? And does that include iPod?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwb</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:51:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21545904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; 20,000 times a day on iPhone.&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; 16-17,000 times a day on Blackberry.&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; 8,000 times a day on Android.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Any dev who, upon seeing those data, doesn't immediately think, 'Holy crap - look at that _huge_ Android number, relative to the installed base!' should have his head examined.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justa Notherguy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:34:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21545386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of Course. Palm is the only one to use web technologies as the heart of its platform. I would be happy to bet that that choice will pay off in the long run.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Edwin Khodabakchian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:16:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21543500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Palm Pre? Are you serious?!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nikolay Kolev</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:13:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21543046</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I was building a mobile app and had to prioritize my resources, I would go iphone -&amp;gt; palm pre -&amp;gt; android -&amp;gt; blackberry. f( how future proof the technology is x size of the existing user base)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Edwin Khodabakchian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:57:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21542930</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Scoble, for once, tell us something we DON'T know. The fact that iPhone comes first as a proving ground for application's success, which then is translated to Android with successful scheme and the same old (maybe spiffed up) art and UI assets, is clear to developers. In fact, App Store with its cuttroat competition is allowing developers who aim iPhone first to weed out their app's potential audience and then translate to Android only if they see their app actually seeing interest among users.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But Scoble, c'mon open your eyes for another app reality - tons of ideas and features are not possible on the iPhone but ONLY on Android. Uberpowerful keyboard managers that integrate custom layouts and OCR, copy/paste with cloud sync and multi-item clipboards, Locale event automation that integrates AI into your phone's activities, Contact lists that redefine social networking, Dialers with predictive search and automated service auto-calling, powerful camera apps that integrate real-time HDR into your photos and apps that immediately capture every new video or image done by any app and upload them to your desired social networks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scoble, when you claimed there were 85,000 reasons to stay entrenched in your iPhone fantasy land, you missed to mentioned the hundreds of apps that are impossible for iPhone (except jailbroken and heavily pumped with Cydia goodness) and you're totally missing out. As anyone who has delegated half of his manual activity with their smartphone to something like Locale, who share media real-time with PicPush, etc. I have discovered the true strength of Android and I think that investing in it even now when it is still young is a wise choice. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Apostol Apostolov</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:53:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developers: the best smart phone platform is?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/01/developers-the-best-smart-phone-platform-is/#comment-21541604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Can Apple or RIM compete against a free and open platform that is supported by so many verticals? I don't think so."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You mean like how Open Source is in all settop boxes, mail servers, appliances etc., so Microsoft and Apple can't compete against all those verticals?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm so tired of the "Open beats Closed, Every time" mantra. Let me guess, 2010, Year of the Linux Desktop, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Se7en</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:11:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>