<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/</link><description>Tech enthusiast, video blogger, media innovator, fanatical about startups at Rackspace, home of fanatical support for Internet entrepreneurs.</description><atom:link href="https://scobleizer.disqus.com/clearing_the_air_with_twitter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:44:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706165</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good interview Robert.  Qik works just fine for this type of impromptu format. Good to see that the Twitter guys are humbly addressing the problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JohnAtkinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:44:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706164</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robyn: we're all a big deal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 16:35:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706163</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert- Do you ever have moments when you sit back and laugh while thinking... "Wow. I actually AM kind of a big deal." If not... you really should.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robyn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 16:30:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706162</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Jesse&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Didn't know you have so much fun the next day - landing an exclusive Twitter interview that Tech Crunch has to write about it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scoble has been good about resting. At least after my post, he didn't stay on to monitor the blog post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That Mike also likes to Twitter non-stop around the clock. He can afford it because he is single. His staff can continue his legacy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have another brilliant Architecture idea. We should advise Twitter to purposely turn down the service or fail the server whenever bloggers Twitter over 24 hrs :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bess</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 16:09:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706160</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Robert, great opportunity that you had and well catched despite the laughs ;-). About the audio I use with my N95 a Plantronics P590. It has two advantage : 1/ on a "duo"  i put the headset round the neck of the interwiewee and thru the bluetooth, i'll get a better than 8k builtin mic.&lt;br&gt;and it's very efficient on a very noisy area like in a street..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On a group of discussion like the one that you had at twitter offices , I usually put the headset on a table and the mic seems to do a good job.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;you can see example of my (french) interveiws on &lt;a href="http://blugture.blip.tv" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blugture.blip.tv"&gt;http://blugture.blip.tv&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I realize talking this way about a product is likely considered as advertisement, if anyone have a clue to how talk about a product you like without  beiing considered as a marketer or whatever devil ppl, please help me out .. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred2baro</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:16:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In the era, of TIVO, Archos TV, Xvid and other misc. time-shifting, the "advantages" of being "live" are minimal, so maybe you get that audience feedback from people who just happened to be glued to their LCDs, at any given time, but once that fleeting moment is gone, the output is, well, junk.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Same thing with moblogging, people posting their lameo out of focus photos inrealtimegeeisntthiscool, but what happened? That "meme", died hard and quick, with the end result of people started posting good pictures, not live, but good pictures on pay presentational sites, of course, the mainstream had already been doing that since the birth of the net, but it took Flickr for the geeks to get all flubbered. Not live, but good. The way you are doing it, the value is lost the second it's over.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Coulter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:04:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wilson ng:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;I think so far friendfeed is not quite there, and it is lame. I also don’t understand your enthusiasm there.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can you elaborate on &lt;i&gt;why&lt;/i&gt; it is you think FF is lame? What is missing? What is flawed? Aren't they reacting quickly enough to recommendations from the base? Or what, exactly?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander von Halem</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 07:45:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter is a hard one to figure out in terms of its mainstream acceptability.  Its big in geek land but most people outside "our" inner circle just don't get it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pbx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 05:30:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is your professional camera?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anthony Colicci</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 02:12:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706155</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, that was to Bess, not Beth.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:14:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Beth, ROFL!  I could tell Robert was getting a little tired towards the end there.  I was pretty exhausted myself. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:13:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706153</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The best part, in a terrific interview, is the shot of Scoble's Friendfeed T-Shirt while in the Twitter office!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All seems well for the moment in the Web 2.0 world (that is a good thing).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now over to Gillmor Gang to listen to the just released show with Friendfeed founders Bret Taylor (genius ++) and Paul B. (he may be as well).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Hammer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 21:46:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think twitter is cool, and so far I can stand an ocassional twiccup.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think Twitters problems is partly caused by the many subscribers it has, but also on the dozens of great 3rd party applications that also puts a load in its db.  I agree that twitters notwithstanding its problems, twitter should not cut them off.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think so far friendfeed is not quite there, and it is lame.  I also don't understand your enthusiasm there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When Friendfeed succeeds, you can quote me on that (grin)....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wilson ng</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 21:41:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706151</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe it would have helped if you had gone to journalism school, before they handed you a cell phone with a camera. Your no Dan Rather, that's for sure.&lt;br&gt;Dump the stupid laugh, and buy a tripod. And maybe one day they'll buy you a real camera. Goof Ball.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bruce</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 21:24:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706150</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All the goofs worrying about the process instead of the content. Probably won't watch black and white films, either.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good job getting the story and getting it out quickly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">altrenda</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:56:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706149</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So basically the end result is that you and your ego were overreacting to what Twitter posted.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:45:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706148</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your interview was great. I thought you asked good questions and was glad to see both Biz and Evan there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;About the quality of video--Qik isn't meant to have the best video quality available (yet?). It's meant to capture video on-the-go while giving you a channel to interact with your audience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's exactly what you used it for here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyone suggesting you used a "regular" video camera doesn't "get" Qik.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Don't listen to the nay-sayers--keep doing what you're doing Robert.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Brad&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad Jasper</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:41:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706147</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jesse Stay is the Book Author of O'Reilly "Facebook Essential" and Co-Author of "I'm on Facebook -- Now What?".  Jesse also runs the Facebook Developer Garage - Salt Lake City Utah. He is the co-organizer of the Western Region of OpenSocial Hackathon Episode III along with Silicon Valley Web Builder (SVWB).  Jesse is not just a developer!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would have make sure this Scoble to take power snap during his 30 hr working around the clock schedule. Jesse has 4 kids including a new born. We wouldn't want to see 2 super dad to get into any silly auto accident.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I suggest we put an automatic warning if any blogger twitter nonstop for 24 hrs. We shut off the Twitter feature to put them to sleep. This would be a safety feature and family-protection plan. Many families will be supporting this feature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Dawn Douglass health warning is good one!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bess</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:38:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706146</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Robert,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why don't you use a Flip Ultra camera? (&lt;a href="http://www.theflip.com/)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.theflip.com/)"&gt;http://www.theflip.com/)&lt;/a&gt;. I'm told the quality is quite high and it seems to be very portable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW, I don't have anything to do with The Flip company or any other company related to the cameras world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Greetings from Barcelona, Spain.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">albertoog</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:28:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706145</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Christopher: well, get some aspirin.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My camera can broadcast live, which is a MAJOR advantage over what you're talking about, especially if you want a two-way audience like I do. And I don't even need to find an Internet connection to upload, either.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Scoble</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:07:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706144</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;how everyone told me “Twitter is lame” first time I told them about it&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And the second, and the third...to eternal infinitude, no matter, it's still lame.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"On a lark", heh, which pretty much sums up most of what passes for "Web 2.0"...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You do know they have Sony Handheld HD's, something like the old HDR-HC1, you could get a basic Steadicam Merlin to go with, and dump to SD, and x264 it pretty quick, maybe even using some form of hardware rendering, keep time limit to 20 min or under, and with the Merlin, you might not need to edit it much, posting fairly raw. Quick and professional, with the HDR-HC1 you can shoulder-bag carry, being quite inconspicuous. Cell phone video are just headaches, no matter what the excuse.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Coulter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 20:02:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Watched the "conversation" yesterday and it was quite useful to understand where Twitter is right now and love the summary, helpful to refer to those who don't understand Qik social live streaming value and just want the facts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Looks like at the beginning, Twitter was really just a microblogging platform and the problems with integrating the whole potential a messaging protocol (XMPP) can provide to the infrastructure are the architectural problems they are facing. I was surprised that they mentioned they only have one copy of the data in the disk with multiple caching updates in memory, they really have pushed the limits with this architecture and the move to a messaging platform it's going to help the downtime, hope it doesn't take them too long.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is a opportunity for the appearance of a WordPress in microblogging (maybe a FriendFeed or Grazr open source). And for messaging, the fact that FriendFeed looks email as their competition (i.e. rooms=RSS mailing lists) signals they have already thought beyond microblogging. If more applications are built related to the mobile web like &lt;a href="http://Moblf.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Moblf.com"&gt;Moblf.com&lt;/a&gt;, then Robert is right and Twitter loyal users can look FF as a viable option.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alberto</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 17:51:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706142</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Scoble, you're awesome.  I don't really care about your clearing the air (no offense to you) I just really like your reporting.  I am just amazed at the excuses coming out of Twitter.  They're snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.  Anyone who says "there will be problems for some time to come" should be fired.  The right people with the right leadership with the right funding can fix anything.  I suspect they have the right people and the right funding.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kapauldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 17:47:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706141</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool - I thought they were going to ration your tweets!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nigeleccles</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 17:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clearing the air with Twitter</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2008/05/31/clearing-the-air-with-twitter/#comment-9706140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I never cease to be awed by the depth of information and argument you get to in the shortest of time. Thanks for your reporting. Good to see someone who is so open to criticism and doles it out in a purely constructive manner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What twitter is concerned: it's good to know that they are aware of their problems (duh) and are open to communication. I think the really important point, which might save twitter in the long run, is the deserved loyalty by the base.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stick to a good thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexander von Halem</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 17:11:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>