Scobleizer - Latest Comments in China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Michael Bailey — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:33:38 -0000

Oh yeah, so you wanna do something about it?

Start with this - quit buying "kids meals" at ALL of the fast-food places.

100% of the kids toys I have seen is made in China - do I really care that it isn't made in the USA?

Nope, I don't care - but THEY might if sales drop more than 70%.

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Michael Bailey — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:31:37 -0000

I personally don't care what China blocks - I don't live there, and I don't work there or have any business there.

What the hell else does one expect from a Communist country?

Whenever I see the headlines start with "China blocks...." I think, whoa, slow news day.

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Jake Ludington — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:13:44 -0000

It's seems to be great sport to attack China's decisions about Internet access in China, but if you ask average people in China, they have more important concerns than whether or not they can Google for something. Some of the things I've observed people in China both want and could benefit from are all health related - cleaner air, potable water, private bathrooms in their residences, an OSHA-like standards body to set worker safety standards.

As I pointed out after attending DEMO China in 2006, television censorship in China is much more blatant. And local people are generally indifferent or know ways to get around blocked sites.

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Pedoz Maskadoz — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:44:55 -0000

I've blocked Scoble from my PC. Also removed it from My favorites,...wait it's never been there:-)

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Prokofy — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:44:50 -0000

I'm with Seth E on this one.

However, if you are going to boycott the Chinese Olympics, it should not only be over the Internet, but over the suppress of Tibet and the Uighurs; over the propping up of the murderous Sudanese regime's actions in Darfur and other regions; over Chinese obstruction of UN resolutions on Burma -- over many other things.

I personally would advocate not boycotting, but showing up and demonstrating, quietly or noisily, but attempting to be visible there while the spotlight is on China. Companies should not do business with China, however, as long as they pursue these policies. We should back the people in China who make efforts to reverse these oppressive practices.

The boycott of the Soviet Olympics in 1979 over the invasion of Afghanistan and the jailing of dissidents didn't have much effect on the regime but it did deprive it of legitimacy. I'm not certain that not boycotting and showing up and demonstrating would have been the better option.

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Ron — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:51:36 -0000

@40 you keep referencing the same articles wherein google says they've "received reports". With no attribution. I have no doubt you've received mails supporting your conspiricu. But you also must acknowledge you've received comments to the contrary. Unti

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Peter Murray — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:19:22 -0000

Up until just a few minutes ago, the courts in Turkey were blocking Scobleizer.

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Duncan — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:37:16 -0000

http://news.google.com/?ned...
Is true, and I've received an email from someone in Beijing just now confirming it again for me. Google says it's true, and apparently Google.cn was being redirected as well.

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Ron — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:08:00 -0000

@35 That may be all well and good. It may be true some sites are getting redirected in some areas. But even as you state, some are not. So, we don't have definitive CONFIRMATION from Google that the Chinese Govt is deliberately redirecting searches to Baidu. What we have now is samplings of both happening. One could use the same logic to prove the existence of UFO's. Plenty of people say they've seen UFO's. Afterall, numbers don't lie (usually)

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

fonstuinstra — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 23:54:43 -0000

The story is not true. I have no problem here in Shanghai and none of the China-based bloggers is reporting problems. What is blocked is youtube and people are very upset about that.

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Steve — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 23:19:10 -0000

I'm in Beijing and have been happily googling (and I use it a lot!) and haven't once been redirected to Baidu (or anywhere else).

However, for the past day or so, Youtube has been blocked. Due to the bandwith, it's not an easy thing to proxy around either. Tor might just do it, but it's going to be very slow.

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

maths — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:47:02 -0000

Robert, for a leader of the blogging community, it is disappointing that you have a childish, one-dimensional response,
"NASDAQ should delist Baidu immediately in retaliation, if this is true. The USA should pull out of the Olympics next year. China is counting on that to make a ton of great PR and make China look like a world leader (which it is, but things like this set it way back in my mind). We shouldn’t enable the American media to be used with the Olympics if this turns out to be true."

1) “"NASDAQ should delist Baidu immediately in retaliation”. And exactly for what crime? NASDAQ has not de-listed Baidu for the more obvious crimes of blatant massive copyright infringement with it’s direct mp3 access machinations, and with American interests including Goldman Sachs involved, the duplicities are apparent.

2) “The USA should pull out of the Olympics next year….. We shouldn’t enable the American media to be used with the Olympics if this turns out to be true”
Every wrong (or perceived wrong) by China has an obvious response with no sense of perspective whatsoever– boycott the Olympics. What a spoilt brat kind of response is that? The Olympics has simply turned out to be a stick to hit China with to make other nations force China to carry out their whims.

3) “China is counting on that to make a ton of great PR and make China look like a world leader (which it is, but things like this set it way back in my mind).”
We all know that George Bush undertook a great PR and political stunt this week by giving China an obvious slap in the face. Why is it that I’m not expecting to see other world religion leaders feted equally and queing up to receive their Congressional Medals of honor. An obviously politically motivated act will be met with an equally political response, and I’m going to sit out that one, but we all know that politics can get ugly.

I work in China, and have been greatly inconvenienced by the numerous internet access problems not all of which I agree to, but please do have a sense of perspective and listen to more voices than that of Rebecca McKinnon and Global Voices Online who with all due respect, have their accompanying viewpoints as their functions and roles dictate. Comments like the following are just broad brushstrokes that do not befit the status of a respected Scoble blog. “This is a reminder that China is a communist country where the people aren’t really allowed to own things and where businesses don’t really need to play fair.”

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Duncan — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:46:25 -0000

Ron
we had numerous emails and comments prior to the main story being published (ie my second one) that confirmed the validity, complete with screen shots. As I noted in comment 31, censorship is rarely uniform in China as a lot of it is done at ISP level so you'll often get stories of sites being blocked in Shanghai but not Beijing...well not immediately anyway. Balance of probabilities is that the story is correct based on the evidence at hand. So Sam Sethi has someone in Beijing who can still get on...we've got a list of commenters on TC and reports from other sites that people cant. Numbers don't lie (usually :-) )

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Ron — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:35:23 -0000

@33 again this is why bloggers should not pass themselves off as reporters. The register is somply referring to the same google link sullivan links to. Which says they've had "nubetoisreports". That's NOT confirmation. We also have numberous reports that the story is bs. Mo one has confirmed anything

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Duncan — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:36:00 -0000

The Register also has confirmation from Google
http://www.theregister.co.u...

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Duncan — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:38:41 -0000

Just checking the comments on my post (just out of bed!): Google has confirmed the blocking according to Danny Sullivan.Sam can protest all he wants on blog nation but if Google says its true, who would you believe?
http://searchengineland.com...

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Duncan — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:36:34 -0000

Robert
It wasn't just a couple of reports backing this (I chose to link out in the second post) but also various emails and comments on the first post as well.

BlogNation can debunk the story all they want but as I understand it the Great Firewall of China isn't in some single room blocking all traffic in China, censorship is often (or mostly) implemented at an ISP level. We regularly see stories about sites being block in particular cities in China only. If access isn't blocked in Beijing on a certain ISP this doesn't debunk the otherall premise: that the Chinese Government has ordered this action, it just means the message or action hasn't filtered down and implemented everywhere yet. There are too many reports from too many people to indicate that there is truth in this story.

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Ehab — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:24:21 -0000

Funky - more or less. Same as what happens in Bangladesh now and then :D

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Patrick Dodds — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:38:56 -0000

Maybe you're right and perhaps I'm off topic, but worsening state censorship, if this is indeed what has happened, isn't this of a piece with the Chinese authorities generally reckless disregard for human rights?

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Ron — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:28:01 -0000

@20 I thought the suggestion was to boycott the olympics because of the Baidu issue. What does AI have to do with that?

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

american gigolo — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:11:21 -0000

Bummer! Now how are we going to tell people in Chine how unhappy their lives are?

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Andrew Smit — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:59:14 -0000

I'm currently in South Africa, and http://search.yahoo.com redirects to baidu. Anyone know if this is related?

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Flemming Riis — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:55:22 -0000

-These companies are so dependent on these workers that they aren’t willing to pull out and punish the Chinese for actions like these.

look around your computer stuff and try to see how much if is made or assembled in china.

That China does what they want isnt exactly news.

The new and "improved" burma cut of themselv from the internet to stop new getting in and out thats more efficient than blocking search engines.

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Patrick Dodds — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:52:55 -0000

Again, from Amnesty International's website:

Ye Guozhu was sentenced to four years' imprisonment in 2004 for his opposition to forced evictions in Beijing associated with construction for the Olympic games. It emerged during 2006 that Ye had been tortured while in detention. He was reportedly suspended from the ceiling by the arms and beaten repeatedly by police in Dongcheng district detention centre, Beijing, and also reportedly tortured in another prison in the second half of 2005.

C'mon, what's this compared with how many Golds you get?

Re: China blocks search engines…(or not, according to Blognation)

Ron — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:50:41 -0000

@16 google doesn't confirm anything. They simply say "they've had numerous reports". Hardly a confirmation. We also get numerous reports of UFO and Elvis sightings. Point is it seems to be sporadic.