Now that OQO device is cool: "Just 4.9 inches long, 3.4 inches wide, 0.9 inches thin, and weighing only 14 ounces, the model 01+ can fit in a pocket or purse and go with you anywhere."
Pretty much all the browsers other than IE can pass it. IE goes down in flames.
When is that going to be fixed?
anon
· 3 years ago
Robert: what's the resolution on that 102" HDTV? Is it real HDTV at 1080p?
Alexander Scoble
· 3 years ago
Bah...plasma is so cliche and overrated.
You want a thin panel display then wait for SEDS when it comes out in a year or so.
I'd say get an LCOS system like Sony's SXRCD, except I absolutely refuse to buy Sony after the whole DRM rootkit thing. Never really liked them anyhow as they are one of the main reasons why most TV sets are set at 10,000 Kelvin or higher, plus they fudge on their specs a lot worse than most.
And yes, the 102" HDTV is 1080.
You are much better off getting a 3 element DLP projector from Runco. Costs a lot less and has better resolution.
Doug Mahugh
· 3 years ago
Kudos on posting so many pictures lately. They make me feel like I'm there at CES this week.
And photos help eliminate a few pointless debates. If you used *any* adjectives at all to describe Microsoft's booth, someone might feel compelled to quibble over your choice -- it wasn't "wall to wall" it was more like "not too deserted" -- but a photo is what it is and there's nothing to argue about.
Or are you creating all of these from scratch in Photoshop? Did Microsoft really have a booth at CES?
Netanel Jacobsson
· 3 years ago
RObert, I will send you the Maxthon version with wordpress tonight. Let me know what you think of it and any improvements that can be made. Typepad support on the way too. Thanks for the nice words. Hang on for the major release of Maxthon 2.0 this month..
JPT
· 3 years ago
Maxthon rocks as well as WordPress. I can not wait to the release of 2.0
Christopher Coulter
· 3 years ago
Going HD-DVD, will be like going Betamax. And it's 'Blu-Ray' not Blue. Lower priced? Sure, also lower capacity, and less content. In time, the HD-DVD promoing will end up being quite embarrassing, egg-on-face. Word to the wise.
But all other things mentioned, be quite nifty. OQO been vapor for so long, but finally here, too niche edged market tho. Old news too, as be the Motion news. I am guessing no one is feeding you Tablet news anymore? :)
scobleizer
· 3 years ago
Well, I hear Blu-Ray is going to start at $1,000. I sure can't afford that. Not after putting out $4,000 for a screen, and $400 for an Xbox. HD-DVD is starting at $500.
Simon Brocklehurst
· 3 years ago
Forget $1000 for Blu-ray. The Blu-ray platform will get massive distribution via the player built into Sony's PS3. I don't think anyone is predicting the PS3 sales will be slow - there's going to be huge demand.
However, I think both Blu-ray and HD DVD have a much bigger problem that that. And that is that there are almost no *genuine* and *substantive* benefits to consumers in the new formats. So why are people going to rush out and buy players?
And no, I haven't forgotten about picture quality... For anyone interested, see my blog entry - "Blu-ray & HD DVD Players - Will Anyone Buy Them?" @
Actually, Chris Pirillo is now using Firefox, or so it seems. He says it's because the IE7 rendering engine in Vista is still rather buggy, and with Maxthon using the IE rendering engine it succombs to its bugs too.
Tetra
· 3 years ago
"New Motion Tablet PC is small! I think I’m gonna get one of these to make Patrick jealous."
Wait, is that the same Motion that is suing Microsoft?
Keith Patrick
· 3 years ago
OQO isn't new, though, is it? My brother was looking at one of those (bought a FlyBook instead) about a year ago. They're really cool and close to my idea portable (if it does RDP well, it's a winner), but $2000 is still too high for a Tablet form fact (wasn't Allchin saying the prices were dropping soon many moons ago?"
Scott
· 3 years ago
Is that the same OQO that ships with USB 1.0 and 802.11b?
anon
· 3 years ago
I don't understand how Microsoft employees don't feel dirty hyping HD over Blu-ray just because Bill Gates told them to do so.
The main difference between the disks is that Blu-ray has double the capacity of HD. That means double the content, double the resolution, etc.
All of the features (DRM, etc) Microsoft adds on top of HD are software-driven; there is absolutely no reason Microsoft couldn't add them to Blu-ray as well.
Why is the Microsoft camp trying to confuse the marketplace shoving this betamax-like standard down customers' throats when a superior format exists?
Simon Brocklehurst
· 3 years ago
For everyone talking about Betamax, it's worth reminding people that Betamax was technically superior to VHS. In other words - technically superior formats do not always win out.
I wonder if the winner in HD DVD vs Blu-ray war will end up being decided according to which platform is adopted by porn movie makers; as many people say was the case for the VHS vs Betamax war?
Brad Corbin
· 3 years ago
Re: the HD DVD vs Blu-Ray debate
The technical details are interesting for us geeks, but in the real world its going to come down to:
0. Do enough people own HDTVs to CARE ?! 1. When are the technologies going to be widely available? 2. Which format has the most movies that people are interested in buying? 3. Is there a difference in player cost? How much? 4. Is there a difference in movie cost? How much? 4. All other things being equal, is there some killer feature on one that the other doesn't have? (either killer good or killer bad)
For #4, I'm thinking of something like: "Oh, this one won't play my existing DVDs? Ok, I'll buy this other one that will." or "Wait, this one has to hook to a phone line to verify I have a license to play my own disks??" or "This extended edition movie comes on one disk for this player, but come on two disks for this player?" or "This one isn't compatible with my older HDTV. This one is."
Based on what we're seeing at CES, I'm thinking that HD DVD is getting an early jump, at least in the eye of the (geeky) public. We'll see if that pans out in the long run.
Scott
· 3 years ago
re: OQO, nope they upped the USB to 2.0, but the built in wireless is still 802.11b. Nifty, so you have to take up the only USB port to get the gain in bandwidth. Or plug in a hub.
I'm not convinced that thing will ever ship. They've been hyping it forever.
Michael Parekh
· 3 years ago
Robert, now that you've seen a motion ls800 and the oqo tablet pcs at the same show, do you have a preference for one over the other?
thanks for all the pictures.
kris
· 3 years ago
regarding the host/sonspring- tried your link on my OQO 01+ and works great. I love my 01+, no more friggin laptop bags to schlepp around, I can do power point presentations right from my little ole' device and much more. It makes traveling as much I do much less painful (physically and mentally).
Adam
· 3 years ago
Scott,
The OQO has been shipping since 2004; the 01+ since 10/2005. Wake up! >;-)
Christopher Coulter
· 3 years ago
Simon, sorry, this isn't the early 1980s anymore, Chatsworth is not the deciding factor here, plus most porn (which is really an meth-like addiction) is now internet driven, as it feeds the constant wanton desire, porn DVDs are so yesterday. But the blockbuster tentpoles and TV Shows on DVD are the real market, with 6 major studios signed up for Blu-Ray, with 2 nominally also supporting HD-DVD, it's already game over. Just Toshiba and Microsoft playing spoiled brat. Toshiba will see the handwriting on the wall soon enough and try and cut a deal (if they are smart).
Oh the Microsoft armies are lining up behind Gates, but give it time, give it time. They will snap necks, change minds, and spin it as a net positive. Historically that's what always happens, they dig holes, harp on it for 2-3 years, then determine that the market isn't actually listening, and then backtrack, saying it more now opens up more opportunities (good recent example was the Passive Touch model for Tablets).
You gotta wonder what's in the Redmond water, when they can't see which way the market is flowing, you can't dam up the Sea, you know.
And Brad, early jumps oft mean early deaths. The second offering, waits and sees, corrects and jumps in when the market is READY, not just to get a first-mover hit. Playing 'me first games' is horrrrrible economics. Horrible.
o. HD TV's aren't the factor, greater capacity is. Eventually HD will factor in, but for things like an entire season of Desperate Housewives, CSI or Extreme Makeover on ONE disk instead of the 5 DVD9s. Well, see? :) 1. When avail? After PS3 gets about half of it's current PS2 90 million market share. 2. Most movies? Easy. Blu-Ray. 3. Cost: HD-DVD way cheaper, soon to be even cheaper, with no demand. How much? One is around $1,000 otherearound $500, so a $500 difference. But PS3 will lower the market until it reaches the supply demand curve breakpoint. 4. No difference in movie cost of yet, but if too much greater than DVD9 then they will kill the market, sort of a TBD factor. 5. Killer feature? You mean like double the capacity? Blu-Ray is it.
Bottom-line: With Microsoft's backing of HD-DVD I am totally sold that Blu-Ray has won. Microsoft always seems to pick the wrong horses in these games. Just watch what they do, and bet on other side. It's that simple.
Do they feel dirty for slagging it? I doubt it, should they? Yes. But things are upside down in Redmond.
Scott
· 3 years ago
Adam:
LOL, guess their marketing dept. needs a little more work.
Whatever happened to Paul Allens little Vulcan computer?
Christopher Coulter
· 3 years ago
PS - I forgot the real killer. HD-DVD on 360 is for film/tv content only, not games. And no word if that will change, which even if it does, will create serious customer confusion. And most of those (currently) buying 360's aren't of the media center sort, it's all the Live hardcore market. And no word on prices, why buy an add-on, when can get a standalone if same price? Bottom line: Microsoft still isn't that crazy, they are not serious about it, it's just a weak attempt to forestall Sony. The marketing parroting beach balls, like Scoble, aren't exactly aware of the big corporate 'Art of War' games going on here.
With PS3 you have one storyline: Blu-Ray for games, and for movies. One format, to rule them all (well backwards compat. sure). But you won't get a muddied storyline like Xbox 360.
Simon Brocklehurst
· 3 years ago
Chris,
I've not seen any recent stats for how the market breaks down for porn - so I could be completely wrong here. However, my understanding was the adult entertainment industry still releases many thousands of film titles on DVD each year - making something approaching $20B a year market. That's pretty comparable to the market size for regular DVDs of movies and hit TV shows.
The fact that the porn industry *also* makes billions a year from the Internet just shows that the film studios and TV companies are way behind in their thinking on use of the Net; not that porn silver discs are dead (yet).
As I say, I could be wrong here. You may well have better figures for the relative markets sizes than I do. If so, I stand corrected.
monkeyleader
· 3 years ago
Yer the OQO is a nice device - got to play with the 1st generation device a while back. Not too shabby!
All Comments
14 ounces?! Right on.
Link for others wanting to check it out:
http://www.oqo.com/hardware/basics/
http://host.sonspring.com/boxes/
Pretty much all the browsers other than IE can pass it. IE goes down in flames.
When is that going to be fixed?
You want a thin panel display then wait for SEDS when it comes out in a year or so.
I'd say get an LCOS system like Sony's SXRCD, except I absolutely refuse to buy Sony after the whole DRM rootkit thing. Never really liked them anyhow as they are one of the main reasons why most TV sets are set at 10,000 Kelvin or higher, plus they fudge on their specs a lot worse than most.
And yes, the 102" HDTV is 1080.
You are much better off getting a 3 element DLP projector from Runco. Costs a lot less and has better resolution.
And photos help eliminate a few pointless debates. If you used *any* adjectives at all to describe Microsoft's booth, someone might feel compelled to quibble over your choice -- it wasn't "wall to wall" it was more like "not too deserted" -- but a photo is what it is and there's nothing to argue about.
Or are you creating all of these from scratch in Photoshop? Did Microsoft really have a booth at CES?
I can not wait to the release of 2.0
But all other things mentioned, be quite nifty. OQO been vapor for so long, but finally here, too niche edged market tho. Old news too, as be the Motion news. I am guessing no one is feeding you Tablet news anymore? :)
However, I think both Blu-ray and HD DVD have a much bigger problem that that. And that is that there are almost no *genuine* and *substantive* benefits to consumers in the new formats. So why are people going to rush out and buy players?
And no, I haven't forgotten about picture quality... For anyone interested, see my blog entry - "Blu-ray & HD DVD Players - Will Anyone Buy Them?" @
http://www.psynixis.com/blog/?p=79
Wait, is that the same Motion that is suing Microsoft?
The main difference between the disks is that Blu-ray has double the capacity of HD. That means double the content, double the resolution, etc.
All of the features (DRM, etc) Microsoft adds on top of HD are software-driven; there is absolutely no reason Microsoft couldn't add them to Blu-ray as well.
Why is the Microsoft camp trying to confuse the marketplace shoving this betamax-like standard down customers' throats when a superior format exists?
I wonder if the winner in HD DVD vs Blu-ray war will end up being decided according to which platform is adopted by porn movie makers; as many people say was the case for the VHS vs Betamax war?
The technical details are interesting for us geeks, but in the real world its going to come down to:
0. Do enough people own HDTVs to CARE ?!
1. When are the technologies going to be widely available?
2. Which format has the most movies that people are interested in buying?
3. Is there a difference in player cost? How much?
4. Is there a difference in movie cost? How much?
4. All other things being equal, is there some killer feature on one that the other doesn't have? (either killer good or killer bad)
For #4, I'm thinking of something like:
"Oh, this one won't play my existing DVDs? Ok, I'll buy this other one that will."
or
"Wait, this one has to hook to a phone line to verify I have a license to play my own disks??"
or
"This extended edition movie comes on one disk for this player, but come on two disks for this player?"
or
"This one isn't compatible with my older HDTV. This one is."
Based on what we're seeing at CES, I'm thinking that HD DVD is getting an early jump, at least in the eye of the (geeky) public. We'll see if that pans out in the long run.
I'm not convinced that thing will ever ship. They've been hyping it forever.
now that you've seen a motion ls800 and the oqo tablet pcs at the same show, do you have a preference for one over the other?
thanks for all the pictures.
The OQO has been shipping since 2004; the 01+ since 10/2005. Wake up! >;-)
Oh the Microsoft armies are lining up behind Gates, but give it time, give it time. They will snap necks, change minds, and spin it as a net positive. Historically that's what always happens, they dig holes, harp on it for 2-3 years, then determine that the market isn't actually listening, and then backtrack, saying it more now opens up more opportunities (good recent example was the Passive Touch model for Tablets).
You gotta wonder what's in the Redmond water, when they can't see which way the market is flowing, you can't dam up the Sea, you know.
And Brad, early jumps oft mean early deaths. The second offering, waits and sees, corrects and jumps in when the market is READY, not just to get a first-mover hit. Playing 'me first games' is horrrrrible economics. Horrible.
o. HD TV's aren't the factor, greater capacity is. Eventually HD will factor in, but for things like an entire season of Desperate Housewives, CSI or Extreme Makeover on ONE disk instead of the 5 DVD9s. Well, see? :)
1. When avail? After PS3 gets about half of it's current PS2 90 million market share.
2. Most movies? Easy. Blu-Ray.
3. Cost: HD-DVD way cheaper, soon to be even cheaper, with no demand. How much? One is around $1,000 otherearound $500, so a $500 difference. But PS3 will lower the market until it reaches the supply demand curve breakpoint.
4. No difference in movie cost of yet, but if too much greater than DVD9 then they will kill the market, sort of a TBD factor.
5. Killer feature? You mean like double the capacity? Blu-Ray is it.
Bottom-line: With Microsoft's backing of HD-DVD I am totally sold that Blu-Ray has won. Microsoft always seems to pick the wrong horses in these games. Just watch what they do, and bet on other side. It's that simple.
Do they feel dirty for slagging it? I doubt it, should they? Yes. But things are upside down in Redmond.
LOL, guess their marketing dept. needs a little more work.
Whatever happened to Paul Allens little Vulcan computer?
With PS3 you have one storyline: Blu-Ray for games, and for movies. One format, to rule them all (well backwards compat. sure). But you won't get a muddied storyline like Xbox 360.
I've not seen any recent stats for how the market breaks down for porn - so I could be completely wrong here. However, my understanding was the adult entertainment industry still releases many thousands of film titles on DVD each year - making something approaching $20B a year market. That's pretty comparable to the market size for regular DVDs of movies and hit TV shows.
The fact that the porn industry *also* makes billions a year from the Internet just shows that the film studios and TV companies are way behind in their thinking on use of the Net; not that porn silver discs are dead (yet).
As I say, I could be wrong here. You may well have better figures for the relative markets sizes than I do. If so, I stand corrected.
http://monkeyonthemove.textamerica.com/?r=2215196
I say it every year and every year I have to say it again but Im going to CES on of these years :)