Scobleizer - Latest Comments in Blogging is back…

Re: Blogging is back…

wholesale korean clothing — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:40:48 -0000

I agree with you.

Re: Blogging is back…

CC — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:11:02 -0000

"Who cares where the audience is? I don't..."

You should, fragmentation is a killer, as any Business School case-study, from the past century could tell you. Your old Channel 9, in fact, consolidated 8 and 10 into 9, making it actually stronger and better, imho.

Re: Blogging is back…

Scobleizer — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:27:06 -0000

My employer doesn't care about traffic. That might be one clue why it no longer matters that my traffic be where I can measure it.

There are more important things to measure, by the way. Engagement. Twitter, for instance, shows that via @ replies and retweets and other mentions. FriendFeed shows that by number of comments per item and number of likes per item. Facebook is the same.

But Blip.tv shows traffic and there are ways to measure traffic on Twitter, too. Everyone using a URL shortener knows how many clickthroughs they have, for instance (if they care).

Finally, here the audience might have just been bots. On FriendFeed, Twitter, and Facebook you can see that I have about 150,000 followers. All of whom you can click on and see who they are and what level of engagement they have with me. You have FAR MORE INFORMATION about my audience on those services than you have on my blog (well, except the last few weeks I've added a Google Friend Connect widget so you can start to see the same thing on my blog).

Re: Blogging is back…

Three Card Monte — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:14:24 -0000

Ever notice that when ever scobleizer.com traffic falls, Robert claims the audience has moved elsewhere.

It is always to some other service (Blip.tv, Twitter, FriendFeed) on which he, his employer, or audience can not confirm such a claim.

Re: Blogging is back…

Scott Gould — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:05:22 -0000

I agree with you and Dave Winner. As I was commenting on your post yesterday, we need thought through blog content that gives clarity. We've got tons of content, and even more thanks to micromedia. To really add value, we need well written posts that call people to action.

If we didn't have this - what would we tweet about? ;-)

Re: Blogging is back…

Bob DeMarco — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:44:12 -0000

I now recall I first read you on FriendFeed, and it is FriendFeed that drives me to your content.

So I get the point you are trying to make.

The way you think and write, it seems that FriendFeed is a better medium for you, as opposed to blogging all your thoughts, ideas, and pointers.

I think that hulk image of you really helps on FriendFeed.

Meanwhile, you have that little puny image in Disqus.

On further thought and review, I now believe your original point(s) are well taken.

I am a bit slow on the uptake, how did you turn your image into the Hulk Scoble (plus, I'm old in Internet years)?

Ok, I gotta get over to FriendFeed.
'
Everyone have a good day.

Re: Blogging is back…

Joe Dawson — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:33:51 -0000

I agree with Dave Winer that to have an opinion you need more than 140 characters. Micromedia and lifestreaming won't replace blogging instead they compliment and assist to distribute the content to our followers

Re: Blogging is back…

Mark Essel — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:29:30 -0000

Great point Bob. I do believe the depth of immersion within a pages content is more limited in scope when folks find it by serendipitous discovery. But on the flip side, you're getting exposed to a much wider audience (if you're relatively new to blogging like myself).

It helps to find that slice of folks that really love to tune into your message. I don't mind 80%+ that bounce. I'm really grateful that 15-20% had a wonderful read and experience.

Re: Blogging is back…

Mark Essel — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:25:11 -0000

I've been having success (as a small time blogger) mixing my media/content. I compose a few posts a week (4-7) and generally bs and chat with folks in twitter and friendfeed while I'm scanning for interesting info.

Blogs are great for putting together local thought gravity wells that are uninteruppted. Comments then fly in and a very friendfeed like conversation forms below a post. I'd prefer conversations be both under the post, and within social media. That's the glory of the friendfeed iframes, I can have my cake and eat it too (thanks Paul Buchheit and crew).

Re: Blogging is back…

Louis Gray — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:59:58 -0000

In July of 2008 I saw the same thing. I said the importance of blog linking was declining.

http://louisgray.com/live/2...

It is still important to be engaged with the community, but it just doesn't drive traffic. I used to think maybe it was because I had gotten more visible (like those who read Robert probably know who I am already), but it is true across the board. My top traffic sources are Google, followed by Friendfeed and Twitter.

Re: Blogging is back…

Scobleizer — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:33:45 -0000

Fair enough. I might have lose something, but that's the tradeoff that I was willing to make. Now I have a strong blog and a strong FriendFeed and a strong Twitter and a decent Facebook presence (I have more followers on FriendFeed and Facebook than TechCrunch do, for instance). So did I lose volume? We need a few more years to judge that, me thinks.

Re: Blogging is back…

Scobleizer — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:27:58 -0000

I meant that I am not religious about where I conversate with people and that I will got to where they are.

Re: Blogging is back…

Scobleizer — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:24:16 -0000

If you are using Disqus you get FriendFeed comments automatically.

Re: Blogging is back…

Don — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:13:11 -0000

Whatever, you lost me a while ago because none of those mediums result in well thought out posts ... twitter is mindless ... and friendfeed is snippets. I guess the question isn't did your numbers grow, but did you lose possible volume ...?

Re: Blogging is back…

alexmarktl — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:48:56 -0000

I used to read your blog posts regularly, but I just don't have the time to play around with Twitter and FriendFeed all day. To me there everything is just too cluttered and way too much bullshit.

I love simple things and a blog is a fairly simple thing that already makes sense to hundreds of million people. Also I love the way how a blog is not realtime but totally asynchronous and I can read it whenever I have time.

So if you wanna reach Mainstreet and not Geekstreet than my advise is to restart blogging.

Alex

Re: Blogging is back…

Bob DeMarco — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:38:08 -0000

When your hot, your hot.

Does anyone pay attention to how much the twitter nuts actually read?

In other words, not all clicks are created equal and I believe you will find when they find your blog while searching for it, they actually read the content.

Re: Blogging is back…

Rahsheen — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:27:30 -0000

You went surfing? Sweet! I just ate a mango...

Re: Blogging is back…

seanandersen — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:14:54 -0000

Yes where is the "FriendFeed this comment"

Re: Blogging is back…

Steve Rubel — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:49:28 -0000

Long ago (circa 2005-2006) a link from Scobleizer.com or Techcrunch would send thousands of people to my site. I was linked to by both sites in the last month and barely saw a blip - although many came under "direct" and Google which could have been your RSS feed.

Nowadays, though, a link from twitter.com/mashable or twitter.com/garyvee can send thousands of readers. That's part of the reason why I moved from a blogging platform that can syndicate out and also bring back comments in from these same networks. So I agree, gravity has shifted. (leaving this on Frienfeed too under your post)

Re: Blogging is back…

Ron Schott — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:05:53 -0000

In the space of three paragraphs you go from "Who cares where the audience is? I don’t." to "So, I went where the traffic is."

Am I wrong to read this as at least a bit of a mixed message?

For my money I'd like to see you extend your experimental return to blogging to a month, rather than just a week, Robert. I don't think a week will really do this experiment justice.

Re: Blogging is back…

seanandersen — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:04:01 -0000

Another issue is the Google juice...as Tom Foremski's post says
"Also, Google doesn’t pay as much attention to Twitter and Friendfeed as it does to online sites. If you don’t exist on Google, you just don’t exist. It’s not surprising that Mr Scoble made this surprising u-turn."

Well we know this is not true, take a look at how long Google takes to index a Friendfeed or a twitter post.
Right now Google: "Blogging is back? ORLY" I see twitter.com as the first result and Friendfeed will follow shortly. FYI: I don't even see scobleizer.com in the results yet. LOL

Re: Blogging is back…

David Jacobs — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:50:44 -0000

Blogging never went away, you just went off the reservation. Your blog should be
thehub of all activities as it's the only space you completely control.
Friendfeed may go away but your blog is forever.