-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/01/bad-hosting-day-blog/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
2 weeks ago · 181 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
3 days ago · 24 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
2 days ago · 8 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
I gave them a whole bunch of chances, and they were Mickey Mouse all the way to the day I switched hosts to one that provides tech support 24/7 and great service for *less* money than I paid Dream Host.
Dream Host may do blogging right, but when it comes to hosting, they just don't have their act together.
They don't need a good explanation, they need a good contingency plan.
When everythings working, Dreamhost is great. They provide a nice control panel, good pricing, nice features. But unfortunately, they have a bit too much downtime.
I was with them for a year and had numerous instances of "we're taking the server you're on down for maintenance", "we're replacing the harddrive in your server", "we're doing [insert whatever] on your server" and so on. And those are just the announced downtimes. There were many more periods when the site I hosted with them would be inaccessible (from multiple locations -- it wasn't a home connectivity problem).
So: A day and a half in total? Probably less. And most of this was the outages they report in the blog.
1.5 days of 365, that's about 99.6 uptime. It seems like Del.icio.us and Flickr has been more offline than that during the same period...
I'll finish out my year with DH, and see how they do. They do have excellent pricing, and I like the honesty... but if things don't improve by the end of the year, I may have to move.
Cosmo
Qualifier - uptime has been superb for the price. We don't pay that much, and we get more from them than we could elsewhere for the captial we outlay. I don't have stats ready to hand but the downtime we've had isn't as much as reported above. YMMV.
We'll be leaving soon but not because we're miffed - we're simply outgrowing DreamHost and we can get a colo server cheaper than they can provide.
Why they are not using power generators. Or at leasta kind of a batteries…
Cosmo the answer to your question is in the linked article.
However, i dont think that this honesty is enough fi you run a web based business. What you need is reliability and thats something that DH was lacking.
Yes i know..if you want to run a business site in a 7,95usd/month hosting you are a cheap-stupid-bastard but... come on, a full month of problems?
That full month of problems were nothing but excuses, i also host in Mediatemple and they are located in the same facilities... Why did MT went down just 12 seconds in the last 3 weeks?
And im not talking about few minutes down.. im talking about almost 3 days down in a row; and 2 or 3 hours every single day for almost a week.
Yes, i love their honesty, the pricing and the features... but sometimes i love reliability and uptime.
(BTW, im still hosting some blogs in DH)
http://chennailiving.blogspot.com/2006/08/why-c...
They explained that - it was a power problems PLUS a raft of internal issues on their network that brought them low.
Yes, i love their honesty, the pricing and the features… but sometimes i love reliability and uptime.
Agreed but . . . you get what you pay for.
http://blog.dreamhost.com/2005/08/08/why-web-ho...
I remember when they posted that blog entry (quote from it: "Fortunately we were apparently super-glued to the biggest cash heifer this side of Ebay...Our data center and network expenses, i.e. our 'Cost of Revenue', is about 5% of our total revenues.. and it drops every year.")
Hmm...
Mike
I can assure you that our servers are load balanced and very well optimized by our system administrators. Furthermore, they are constantly monitoring the servers and are doing their best to keep them in their optimal performance state all the time.
As for your account, which currently resides on our shared server, it will be automatically suspended seven days after this ticket was opened, and due to the above mentioned reasons, we can no longer make any exceptions. If you consider the upgrade to a VPS as unworthy, then as least you will have enough time to transfer all of your files.
----
Access count to my site on siteground < 100 ip per day