-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2009/06/28/back-to-blogging-week-no-friendfeedtwitter-for-a-week/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
2 weeks ago · 181 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
3 days ago · 24 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
2 days ago · 8 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
Computer security CAN be solved... but not with virus scanners, locking down ports, firewalls, etc. A ground up rebuild based on capability based operating systems will eventually be required. (They've existed since the 1960s, so it is possible)
The internet is not a mesh, but it should be... taking out any single node, or small number of nodes should NOT take down access for a large group of people or machines.
SMTP - the protocol behind email, has no way to authenticate senders.... perhaps it's time to chuck it in the bin of history?
As long as our computers aren't secure... cable and telcos will be using this as an excuse to filter our connections and censor us.... how can we change this?
I've got more....
A piece of constructive criticism? Try making a post without a single mention of FreindFeed or Twitter.
Back to Blogging Week - 4 mentions of FF, 3 of Twitter.
Real-time Systems - 12 mentions of FF, 12 of Twitter.
Crowd Sourcing - 1 mention of FF, 2 of Twitter.
Future of TV - 2 mentions of FF, 2 of Twitter.
Drama v. Helpfulness - 2 mentions of Twitter.
Cloud Camp - 1 mention of Twitter.
-----
I mean this to be helpful. I'm glad you enjoy spending time on these two social sites. But my tastes differ from yours. I used to enjoy reading your posts - like the one on the future of TV. But what I couldn't get around - what jumped out at me - were these mentions of FF and Twitter. (Do you know that you could have posted about Cloud Camp without that mention?)
I'm having a hard time with all this noise some "A-listers" create anymore about these two sites. Your peer Dave Winer just posted overnight something about a NY Times reporter being kidnapped... and how it was covered up even on Wikipedia... and then? He somehow got around to speaking about one of his larger personal agendas - Twitter's list!
ANyways, glad to see you posting this week. Hope you realize how "helpful" your blog is!
"[F]or those of us who have multiple social media presences, there are certain times when one service will be of most benefit to us, and other times when another service will be of most benefit to us. While one could theoretically maintain an equally consistent presence in all of our outlets, the reality is that this doesn't happen. So it's perfectly understandable if someone temporarily ceases participation in one forum to devote attention to another forum."
I am of the opinion that the blog is still an important bed rock of social media. All our micromedia interactions are somewhat ethereal in nature and this, of course, lessens the value of each tweet / like etc. In the plethora of content that we are having, we need a place where our thought can come together into content that has clarity and is able to help people by providing systems, thought-through frameworks and experiences.
Of course we all know that the cumulative effect of our social media creates influence, authority, etc. We all know that by the nature of "new", we must create new content to stay in the game - but if we truly want to add value we need blog posts like I've described above.
regards
sears parts
regards
sears parts