-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2008/01/26/are-we-in-a-recession/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
2 weeks ago · 181 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
3 days ago · 24 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
2 days ago · 8 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
Things are looking pretty bright from where I'm standing, but maybe that's just me. ;)
I marvel at how you can assume that Steve Jobs is a predicter of what the mass of people will be experiencing in the United States or around the world.
He's an industry exec, a very important one obviously, but he's going to look at what is good for *his* economy, and he doesn't see anything harming that.
Ditto the guy with the 250 start-ups. THEY may all be reporting growth in this big Web 2.0 tech bubble, but what about every other business? Ford, Citibank, all of the companies laying people off now. They're not in start-ups, Scoble, they are in end-downs...
My family members have suffered the foreclosure on a home in one of the worst hit cities in America where it's an absolute epidemic, where you can't get a house rent or sold or paid for because the jobs are gone, too. Seriously, you are *out of touch with the country*.
You didn't seem to grasp what I was saying on Qwk to you in Davos -- a $400 phone and its year of service is way beyond the pocket books of even "wired" people. I couldn't justify spending $400 on a phone; I spent $25 on a virgin mobile. If I have $400, I'm going to be spending it on health care as one of the uninsured contract workers of the country, or I'll spend it on a new computer. I'm not whining, but I'm just here to tell you that you're out of touch. It's like you won't believe the subprime mortgage crisis is real until it touches somebody in the Valley.
The biggest problem is that there's no trust in the financial system right now, which is seizing up commercial credit and business growth. Until companies are forced to mark to market and show true and honest balance sheets, the financial system will continue to implode. Better to take our lumps now and go thru a shorter recession, than to prolong it and make the recession deeper.
Regarding what Steve Forbes says, the guy appears almost weekly on FoxNews as an economic/policital pundit, so I tend to view his forecasts as suspect, as it is in his interests to cheerlead the economy.
I don't expect it to hit the IT industry this time, though.
If consumers cut back on spending, this will affect everything, including tech.
And we're already in a bear market.
I remember in the pre-iraq-war the DOW plummeted to 6000.
As an old saying goes "nobody goes to war with a full belly"
Great stuff!
A lot of the money floating around the US economy ever since 2001: I'm talking about the housing bubble and consumer spending - were basically financed by borrowed money.
Or are there actually people out there driving this that profit from recession and stocks going down?
Sorry folks, while I'm not an expert, it doesn't look, smell, or taste like a recession.
Regards,
Rick
Later that month, the stock market cracked. That is when everything changed.
The layoffs came, the spending froze up, and the stock market kept tanking. The recession "arrived" shortly thereafter.
In my view, this coming recession could be a lot worse than that one. The last time, the consumer kept spending and buying houses and spurred the economy even though coporations slowed down tech spending. This time, that probably won't be happening.
exactly. you won't know you you were in a recession until we see two quarters of negative growth. we haven't even seen *one* quarter yet (as far as I'm aware), and even still by the time it's official there will most likely be a turnaround.
All the money that was being given to people who truly weren't qualified for mortgages is now being put into REAL growth businesses. So some sectors grow while others falter. This is not new.
On another front, the dollar is under severe challenge as a reserve currency due to our decades of reckless spending and consumption - if we dont reverse this this nation is in deep trouble.
Look at any retail-based business that doesn't have an international presence to prop up the US business. They're not growing.
You can probably see this is website traffic to all those great startups, where the international traffic is what is making them look good.
By the way, how many of those 250 startups charge actual money for their service? I don't get the correlation between recession and website traffic...
The small business is a resiliant model of operation, mean and lean, and can weather hard times.
Things currently look bright for our firm and our smart clients, as do the next 10 years. No worries here.
Thanks, Jason M. Blumer
http://www.erica.biz/2008/real-estate-bubble-th...
We are not in a recession yet. I think we won't be until closer to the end of this year. Harry S. Dent is predicting that the stock market just hit its low. He thinks NASDAQ will likely go up 30-36% this year from the low it hit last week. Should prove to be an interesting year!
So... On one hand, we have the crazy - dazy stock market... On the other, we have.... Well, you get the idea ;)
The full page WSJ ads were to convey to the Whittman-Hart employees, the name of the new company...
BRILLIANT!!!
Yet across town in Techno-ville, things are almost overheating. In addition to your Google, Forbes and venture capital datapoints, storage demand continues to outpace supply, even though the industry has been in allocation for several months in a row.
I'm very curious as to how these have and have-not trends will play out.
I work at Joyent.com. We're a Cloud Computing company. Infrastructure on demand. If you go to
http://developers.facebook.com/resources.php
there are only two companies listed as Facebook developer resources: Microsoft and Joyent.
We're bootstrapped, self financed, profitable and our revenues, which are already in the millions, are growing at over 500% annually.
In the last 3 months it has been accelerating past 600% annual growth.
Maybe it's because we offer significantly lower total cost of ownership for infrastructure. Maybe it's because one of our clients was able to use our infrastructure to scale their Facebook application up to 700 million page views a month without skipping a beat.
Sure, we're only one data point.
But if Joyent's experience means anything, Steve Forbes might be right.
http://www.nber.org/cycles/jan08bcdc_memo.html
Colin Joss
East Lothian, Haddington, United Kingdom
I think we have a few things going on here in CA regarding slowdown.
The EDD is ramping up with extended hours.
In response to increasing unemployment, mainly due to the national subprime mortgage crisis and housing slump, the California Employment Development Department (EDD) will be extending hours of operation at many offices to assist unemployed workers. EDD is working to provide extended hours in as many areas of the State as possible.
http://www.edd.ca.gov/onestopextendedhrs.htm
As for people getting loans that never should have been signed. Blame the Congress for the Community Reinvestment Act.
This "Recession" is caused only by greed. That of a maid think he/she can afford a 650k dollar house and the bank for thinking she can pay for it on 10 dollars and hour. So, yes, there is an issue and I will gladly take the 1200 stimulus, but I feel that I should not have to bail someone out for being stupid.
Remember that the US GDP expansion is not the result of "real" growth (making stuff and selling it to others) - it is the result of the credit expansion (borrowing heavily from the rest of the world).
But the rest of the world is reacting now. That is why the recession is starting to show. The EU Central Bank has started to offer the US loans in euros, not in dollars - this means that Bernankes plan to to solve any real crisis by, as he says, "dropping money from helicopters" (thus creating a dollar hyperinflation) will not work.
This could also spell the end of the dollar as the world trading currency - which in practice means the US can no longer pay for oil and imports by just printing more dollars. It has to earn the money like every other country.
The *real* problem occurs when people no longer accept the money no matter it is thrown out of helicopters or whatever. Then we have a deflationary senario. Just like in the 30's. But let us hope this doesnt play out that way - but the US is playing with fire at the moment by keeping its head in the sand and not dealing with the actual economic situation.
One of the overwhelming themes I heard in my area comes from older people, many of whom were kids during and after the great depression. That theme is simply this: we have given our country away in terms of manufacturing, service sector jobs, etc. For better of for worse, this county came out of the depression and made it through WWII largely based on a union workforce. Poo-poo the unions all you want, but you can thank your ability to have a five-day workweek, breaks, and a weekend, along with health insurance basically because the unions fought for these things. Think I'm wrong? The only reason most businesses (non-IT) even offer benefits and other goodies is largely to keep the unions off their properties. IT is starting to become unionized in some places through the CWA. Unions are both good and bad, but they have done more good.
A certain large reataler has done more harm than good as well because in cutting costs, they have forced manufacturers to deliver more and more and more. In order to deliver more and more and more, you have to cut costs by moving offshore. I preferred paying $30 for a pair of Levi's. I preferred paying $5 for a gallon of pickles. Why? Because this stuff was made in the US by well-paid union workers.
Just remember, high wages are good for America. More of a tax base, more money goes into the economy, and, quoting JFK, a rising tide lifts all boats. Now, in the US, our economy is 85% based on consumer goods. This is not sustainable in the long run no matter anyone says. History has shown this to be true. You can only cut costs so much before there is a backlash. The middle class is disappearing in the US at a rapid rate largely because there is no sustainable manufacturing base. People are forced from their manufacturing jobs and end up working for Wal-Mart or other less-than-ideal menial jobs.
Back when the unions were strong, before the republicans killed them off, a man or woman could support their family largely on one income. The fact that houses cost what they do, food costs what it does, and a host of other woes is largely tied to our inability as a nation to provide for ourselves. In the 50s, the US was the most egalitarian, self-sufficient country on earth. The desires of the top 5% of profit mongerers has damned this country.
Techies that have comfortable lives should be thankful. Most of them live in a bubble and don't see how most of the US actually lives. I live in rural TX. I can tell you that people here, through no fault of their own are largely doomed to working for Wal-Mart or other service sector jobs. The hospitals here, one of the only sources of IT jobs have outsourced the IT work to third-world hell holes leaving those IT workers in a pinch.
IT workers who live in larger cities, and especially those who live on the coasts are insulated from the woes of the rest of the country. I know. I worked in the NE for over a decade in a series of cushy IT jobs. I rarely considered the plight of the average American until I moved to TX to be with my aging parents.
This country needs to bring back the jobs. Remember, a rising tide lifts all boats. The greed of the major corporations occurs at the expense of the worker. Let's pray we can turn this trend around or we are in trouble.
I don't think Americans would stop shopping or eating out no matter what. People are largely ignorant when it comes to their own money. I personally know people who have menial jobs who spend and spend and spend. Credit cards. Debt.
Economics are very, very simple: don't spend more than you take in. If everyone followed this golden money rule, we would all be better off.
I also know of people who work the same menial jobs who only spend what they need to, live below their means, save as much as possible, and are recession-proof largely because they have saved for a rainy day, socked away funds, and drive older cars, use older electronics.
Americans have been conditioned to spend, spend, spend no matter what. In the 50s, a family lived in a 1200 sq. ft. home. No one needs a McMansion. They are not good investments. Especially not now. People that cashed out in the last few years got lucky. It will never happen again. No one needs a giant house, a $100k BMW, or a second beach house. These things are wants, not needs. People need the basics with a few cool toys now and again. Keeping up with Joneses has damned more than a few people.
Think about this. 20 years ago, the average CEO made about 20 times the average worker. No, the average CEO makes 400 times the average worker. Uncool. All things considered, the trends have shown the rich get richer and the poor and middle class largely do not advance ahead that much. Unfair. Unfettered capitalism and globalism are damning.
Maybe not so much a change in the idea of a recession, but the underlying commitment to spending time in an office, burning gas, buying servers, building infrastructure. All that has changed, and will continue to change. A recession would merely fuel this, it is happening, people panic, they change the way that they are running companies. In the end, there is a lot of commitment to ideas, lots of enthusiasm, and lots of people changing what they need and how they do things to survive the unknown.
As for those who are still experiencing positive growth and cannot see the recession? Well recessions can be a little lumpy, and the other factor is overshoot - a property of any dynamic system. Can the overshoot keep going to meet the economic recovery that comes after?
For anyone who bought more home than they could afford, well, I'm sorry, but you're going to lose it. Even in the Silicon Valley, people make bad money moves. So, Robert, living in the Valley doesnt make one immune to bad choices. It happens everywhere.
This stimulus package is a joke and it will backfire. Almost no one with any economic smarts is for it... its an election year, thats all this is.
Let's just say that while waiting a year for the passport to the American Dream, (and not working illegally because I am a stupid law-abiding dummy) I am not impressed with the way life here is shaping up!
My wife's home, which she/we renovated to a very high standard (unlike most rehab projects in Phila) has depreciated by perhaps 25% in a year - and even though we are on the point of putting it up for sale at a discount price, because we want to move out West, we still may not be able to sell it without going even further behind.
And over the past year, as an outsider looking around from the inside, I have seen enough to convince me that I wont be signing up to work for any corporations any time soon! It seems to me that the whole middle class are now locked in to their catch-22 lives, and corporation heads now have everything they need to take, take, take from the indebted workforce here, in order to fund the cost of their global expansion to bring new found prosperity (and a new generation of locked-in middle classes) in the developing world.
Not that I have anything against global development, but I prefer a little bit of freedom at home!
Bottom line, I don't think the current recession (aka slow down in incessant growth) is a problem if you are happy to stagnate, or if you dont want to get a better job, or if you dont want to sell your home or if you dont want a couple degrees less stress in your life.
The troubling thing about this one compared to others in the past, is that the most trusted and estblished financial organizations(banks, creditors) were largely responsible for creating/excacerbating the situation we're in now.
To deny that things will get worse befor they get better is like Bush/Rumsfeld on the war in Iraq.
To quote the man that most hold personally responsible for all the supposed economic good times during the Clinton administration...Alan Greenspan: "The probability of a recession is 50 per cent, maybe more, but we are not there yet."
and from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/377d5532-cae8-11dc-a9...
""The initial [unemployment] claims data are not signalling -recession.""
The US economy may not be growing at all but it is not yet clear that it is falling into recession, Alan Greenspan, the former Federal Reserve chairman, has told the Financial Times.
Mr Greenspan said: "The reason we have had this extraordinary volatility in stock markets over recent days is that there is extreme uncertainty about the financial and economic outlook."
In a series of interviews with the FT, Mr Greenspan argued that the mark of a recession was discontinuity in the economic data. "You don't gradually fall into recession, you jump," he said.
"We are beginning to see discontinuities in the data - for instance, the employment report and the Philadelphia Fed survey," he said.
But other indicators continued to give more positive signals. "The hard data that we are in recession is by no means conclusive," he said.
He questioned the utility of using standard economic models to forecast whether the US would now go into recession or not.
"The models never forecast recession, because the parameters are dominated by what happens in normal times when the economy is growing," he said. "In fear-driven periods the parameters are quite different from the periods of euphoria."
My advice, Mr. Scoble? Leave economic forecasting to the experts.
Why would anyone with a rational mind pay $30 for something they can get for $5" How does the fact that it's made by a "well paid union worker" make that a smart purchasing decision by the consumer? I'm pretty sure gas is distributed by union truckers. Would you pay $10/gal for gas because it was delivered by a union truck driver, if you could get it for $$3/gal across the street because it was delivered by a non-union truck driver?
"This country needs to bring back the jobs. Remember, a rising tide lifts all boats. The greed of the major corporations occurs at the expense of the worker. Let’s pray we can turn this trend around or we are in trouble."
To quote Milton Friedman: "If all we want are jobs, we can create any number--for example, have people dig holes and then fill them up again or perform other useless tasks. Work is sometimes its own reward. Mostly, however, it is the price we pay to get the things we want. Our real objective is not just jobs but productive jobs--jobs that will mean more goods and services to consume."
Gosh, I'm so glad you set me straight on that because I might have gone on mixing them up forever because they are so indistinguishable when you get a certain distance away from being cool like they are, but oops I think I might do that again because I'm so stupid but what's more important is that you're so smart and will be able to maliciously and gleefully correct me again and again .
That kid has it rough - autism and parents who didn't know that they shouldn't buy a house that they can't afford.
The kid has my sympathy - the parents, not so much.
That said, clearly there are a lot of middle class families that are suffering from significant "economic distress."
Unfortunately, no matter how short (or long) the formal "recession" lasts (if it occurs at all), the economic distress of the middle class will persist.
Even a moderate economic "slowdown", which we are obviously in the middle of even if we are not in a formal recession, can cause significant economic distress for a significant fraction of the population. Not to mention the emotional stress of constantly being bombarded with messages of doom and gloom from the media even if your own situation is actually reasonably solid. The overall economic message coming from the media right now is that if you are not worrying about a recession, you should be worried.
So, there are two bottom lines here:
1) The economic distress of the middle class is not linked to whether a formal recession is underway.
2)"Fixing" the formal recession (if it even exists at all) will not fix the economic distress of the middle class.
Be clear, is your question about a formal recession per se, or simply whether there is enough of a slowdown in growth that significant numbers of people are feeling pain?
Health care "reform" (including care for chronic conditions such as you mention) obviously needs to be a key part of relieving the economic distress of the middle class. Debating whether we are or aren't in a formal recession is orthogonal to addressing such social issues.
-- Jack Krupansky
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/WalterEWilli...
Wish it was that way everywhere. Some areas of the US will have it quite rough. I feel for those of you who are going through tough times. It was like that here back in the early 80's.
This is limited to the "high tech" sector, not a broad view.
Personally, I don't really care if you call it a recession or not. Unless it's so bad that EVERYONE agrees, it doesn't matter so much.
Lowering interest will attract people to go into debt while spending will keep the economy going.
Not doing anything will make people crazy, because they think government doesn't care about what's happening.
Increasing interest will piss everyone off, because those with debts will be strangled even more and those who are not will go into trouble because of this.
So, I think lowering the interest still the best option there is for the goverment to make.
About Davos, I hope you get the chance to read French policy analyst Dominique Morsi's incisive and salient editorial about how Davos has devolved from a barometer for significant world trends to a mere mirrored echo chamber. I quote: "[...]call it the 'I was told in Davos' impramatur -- which explains why political and economic analysts and commentators, keep coming back despite the forum's combination of pomposity and intellectual vacuity."
I think the subprime mess and housing market hit a bottom in Dec. Dec is when homebuilder's finally got the hint and stopped building, this historically has proved to be a bottom. No doubt subprime is bad, but its pretty much built into the market, I don't see another shoe dropping unless we end up with a big unemployment problem, which I don't see coming from my vantage.
Also I wish the stimulus was better focused on small biz and not individuals who I predict will run to Best Buy and buy a flatscreen made in China... money flowing with little in between directly out of our economy.
1. An economic downturn is when a neighbor two blocks away loses his/her job and he is up-ended for a couple of months to a year(s).
2. A recession is when some near and dear to you loses his/her job and he is up-ended for a couple of months to a year(s).
3. A depression is when YOU his/her job and he is up-ended for a couple of months to a year(s).
You can spin the issue around a million technically theoretical ecomonic methods, but it still only boils down to these simple, direct points!
In spite of the "media contrived recession," we still had positive growth in the 4th quarter of 2007. February 2008 bls stats indicate an unemployment rate of less than 5%.
On the other hand, we must reduce our dependence on foreign oil. Nuclear, wind, solar and whatever we can use for energy must be developed. Unfortunately, environmentalists fight every option we attempt. Why?
Get your facts straight - subjective reasoning while reasonably interesting misses the point. Objectively we are not in a recession - which requires two negative quarters of GDP growth - in fact, we have not even achieved one quarter of negative GDP growth - yet. And we may, and we may enter into a recession, but redefining the term to mean that because you lost your job or a loved one had their house foreclosed is misleading and emotionally based - not factually accurate.
Keep it real, keep it objective, leave the story telling to grandpa.
History repeats.
7 year cycle
Reason: Let your slaves go free on the 7th year.
Origin: Biblical
Controller: WZO
Plan: do your research.
The WWW is an excellent resource. Turn off the TV and live. Read the book of truth for more reasons and clues.
Signed
Fellow Slave...
Have you considered we are not in a recession, but maybe we as americans have been living beyond our means?? we have crossed that boundary, and now we are reaping the consequences of that??
Yes, people are defaulting on credit cards... but why did they overextend their credit?
Yes, people are being forclosed on, but why did they think they could afford a 400,000 home on a 50k a year job?
My wife an I have worked hard the past 2 years to pay off all our credit card debt, pay off 2 cars, 1 jetski and 1 motorcycle that we had overextended ourselves on. After paying that all off, we still scrimped and lived frugally, and now have 6months of living expenses in an amboydirect savings account making around 4% interest (not alot, but not risky either). When we have our first child in august, we will both take 16 weeks off (unpaid) and still have enough $$ to live on. We also have another account that we have saved about $5k in. this is our emergency fund. It pays for home/car repairs. Yes, that means no credit cards to pay for emergencies. No stress when we run over a nail and need a new tire.
Now we only have our utilities/food/gas and mortgage to pay every month. This means out of our less than $4k a month take home, we have over $2500 a month to invest / save and play with. I went to a local church yardsale last weekend and bought myself a 60" Sony TV (not an LCD) for $300. Did I flinch to buy it?? No, I paid cash. Why? because I don't use credit for anything. If I can't afford to pay cash for it, then I don't need it.
Stop living the lie that you are entitled to drive a tahoe, that you are entitled to that nice lake house and a $30k pontoon boat. You do NOT need that 60" LCD TV.
If the "recession" is breaking you, then I believe you deserve to be broken. If you would learn to manage your $$, and live within your means ( not your delusional ones, but the ones dictated by your current paycheck) then I believe you will find freedom from the slavery of the dollar.
I really encourage any and all of you to do all you can to get out from under your creditors, FAST. Do a google for debt snowball, debt reduction. Stop buying starbucks and start drinking JFG brewed at home. Stop eating out every meal and eat some ramen noodles. If you are buying your $30 angus steak on your visa, then should you be eating that steak?
We need to start helping ourselves by making it a priority to "buy American" made products whenever possible. We need to refocus our efforts on "Made in the U.S.A." instead of supporting products made offshore or using services now being set up in record numbers offshore. As a nation, we continue to give it all away. It is financial suicide. Now, despite the fact econimc statistics say we are not in a recession, why are vendors who are setting up at nationwide flea makets routinely selling one item for $14.95 after a days work? After the booth fee and gas costs, they are down about $100. Based on sales, it appears people are not spending money, when they do spend it is with a credit card, and the people trying to earn an extra buck to pay for living expenses are going in the whole for trying.