DISQUS

Scobleizer: Always on isn’t for me

  • Rocky · 2 years ago
    By the way, Robert was not referring to AlwaysOn, the conference series. Just to be clear! :-)

    Rocky-
    Scoble Show Editor
  • Bill Olen · 2 years ago
    Very nice post and video clip, thanks!
  • colin · 2 years ago
    "it worked all the way..."

    Wasn't this the drive where it was very choppy and video/audio would repeatedly drop out?

    This stuff can work (as it did 7 years ago) but it takes a lot of tweaking with the bitrate and compression to get it right (which you probably don't have access to with the upstream service), plus you'd need a increased buffering window option on the service to allow for less reliable connections.

    Upload speed on wireless is always an issue.
  • PXLated · 2 years ago
    Robert...Quick question...Hows Verizon treating this? They have finally admited that unlimited is not actually unlimited but 5-6Gigs down per month, exceed it and they can cancel you. They don't mention upload limits.
  • Robert Scoble · 2 years ago
    PXLated: I'm breaking Verizon's TOS. Yesterday I uploaded something like 700MB. I'm sure I'll get kicked some point.
  • Robert Scoble · 2 years ago
    Colin: yeah, I should have been clearer that it did cause reboots several times when we went over the mountains.
  • djchuang · 2 years ago
    would you do a tech-geek-blogger compare & contrast between ustream.tv and stickam.com -- I think they're both kinda similar, but the latter has a lot of people using it already
  • Kosso · 2 years ago
    Robert,
    Thanks so much for doing yesterday. Both you and Jeremiah did an excellent job. It was like hangin' out with you at a conference in SF for hours! From London!

    Excellent experience overall!

    Can't the ppl at Verizon Wireless have 'a word'? ;P - they're a Podtech client http://podcast.com/show/6524

    Let's face it, the Flash Media/Communication Server technology to do this had been around for years.

    IMHO the KEY enabler here for 'mobleScoble' to work is the advancement and availability of the wireless connections these days.

    This is just the beginning.

    Mark my works, in two years the streams/speeds/quality/tools and UIs available will make all this look so lame.

    It will be mutli-screen-mega-stream-mashup madness (with a side order of twitterness)

    I have seen ustream 'listening' to people's requests. First the irc chat rooms. Now pop-out chat etc too. and more.

    There's so much can be done here with all the archived content too. I hope to help along there in some ways. ;p

    BTW: here's the moment you met justin.tv ;)
    http://kozcast.com/scoble/scoble_justin.jpg

    cheers! Koz
  • Michael Sommermeyer · 2 years ago
    You could do much of this stuff nearly 10 years ago, but it required practically standing on your head, holding your tongue just right and a good amount of patience to make it happen. I remember playing with Win Media, WinAmp, Flash, Real and a few homebrew solutions to attempt to get some video out to the world.

    The difference this year is that much of the scalability has been solved and the tools are becoming more accessible. Currently, I can just open my MacBook and stream out my life using the built in camera. And multiple WiFi hotspots makes it nearly too easy to connect from remote spots.

    Now, as Scoble has learned, it will be up to streamcasters to redirect their creativity and brainpower from wasting time on solving the technical issues to dreaming up content that's engaging, fun and interesting to watch. When that happens, this tool is going to explode. We're right on the edge.
  • monkeyleader · 2 years ago
    monkey is tring it out (http://www.ustream.tv/watch/channel/WYjPqQG0iCy...) it was kinda weird this morning as I had a few txt messages from people saying they could see me sleeping, then another one saying .. wow i just saw you wake up and read the txt... I quite like the idea of being online 24x7 .. trouble is in the uk the wireless network wouldnt sustain a 24x7 connection ...

    /monkey
  • Neuromancer · 2 years ago
    Robert

    Have ypu seen this (http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/04/h...) from the BBC they are trying to get blogers to help in raiseing the profile for a kidnaped BBC corospondant

    "the BBC is very concerned for the safety of our correspondent Alan Johnston who was abducted in Gaza on 12 March."
  • Clemens F Vasters · 2 years ago
    "It won’t be the last time live video is used journalistically"

    ... because there's a whole industry that does that?
  • David Dalka · 2 years ago
    Neuromancer - That is certainly an interesting usage.

    Robert - Good decision.
  • Christopher Coulter · 2 years ago
    Well that Web 2.0 conference was pretty much worthless, you missed NAB for this?
  • LayZ · 2 years ago
    "It won’t be the last time live video is used journalistically."

    You aren't seriously suggest this is something new and innovative are you? Wow! Why didnt' people think of this before? I mean, just think for example, how much more interesting the space race and even the moon landing woudl have been had we had live video being used journalistically back then?

    Wha?? You mean we did have it??? Nevermind.
  • Tony · 2 years ago
    Just say no to Justin.TV. Good choice . . . Quality over complete coverage is the way to go. By the way, I've enjoyed this blog for more than a year and I just wanted to give you a quick shoutout for providing some great content!!!