-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2006/10/29/a-zunesters-response-microsoft-employee/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
1 day ago · 22 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
1 day ago · 7 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
I think Zune players will be somewhat eyecatching at first with the larger screen. There has been such limited marketing of Zune so far, though, that most people won't know enough to say, "Hey, man, is that the new so-called iPod-killer from Microsoft?"
- Harvey
(Zunerama)
Possibly but I seldom even see the iPod body anymore. I just see the headphones and have no idea if the listener has an iPod video, Nano, Shuffle or whatever. I'll bet some people buy Apple's white headphones and plug them into a ghetto iRiver or Creative player just to look cool. The Zune's sweet screen may not be seen by many people leading to few conversations.
There's nothing exciting enough about the Zune to get most iPod owners to switch. The Wifi could have been cool but it's not in current implementation. The screen on the Zune is really sweet but I'd prefer a smaller screen and podcasting support. How did they miss that, even at launch? I can imagine every review mentioning how clueless MS must be to miss that feature even if they add it later.
Mr. Caulton seems like a reasonable guy who is doing his best to create a competitive product. He didn't make excuses in his reply and I wish him luck in competing with the iPod.
Zune, iRiver, Zen and others are competing for what is left of the market.
They are all good, they just don't have endorsed the trademarked apple cool factor. Poor the one that has the MS uncool stigma.
Take the Tablet PC, for example. At the beginning of every quarter, I get asked a bunch of questions about it. Every time I take it to a conference, I get asked questions about it. I still know very few people for whom the conversation has led to a purchase, despite them being very enthusiastic about it after we talk. I suspect that something similar happens with other "tableteers", since Tablet PC sales are still quite slow.
Price is a factor. Support for outside software is a factor. "Cool" is a factor. Sometimes, these other factors will overwhelm any inherent conversationality built into the device. You've got to have more than that.
Yah hit the ground running, CE is not a '3rd time got it right' kinda excuse thing, they can somewhat get away with that in software, as Vista SP2 might be actually functional, but you just can't do that with hardware, running the ground running or it's dead. Least won't have the supply chain trainwrecks like 360, as no to low demand. Heck, they will have to resort to massive junkets and giving them away at Conferences, to get any noticeable press flabbing. Not quite SPOT, but close.
That would actually be a good thing for MS and iPod competitors. Water-down the "iPod" name so that it simply means "portable media player" rather than a particular brand (which is why Apple was bitching about the "podcast" term a couple weeks ago). If a person walks into a drugstore intent on buying a box of Kleenex and walks out with a competing brand of tissue paper but still refers to it as "Kleenex", he's done the Kleenex company no favors.
So fine, let people buy Zunes and call them "iPods". MS would take that in a heartbeat.
"They are all good, they just don’t have endorsed the trademarked apple cool factor. Poor the one that has the MS uncool stigma."
Stigmas and cool factors change. Go back and read the commentaries when Apple announced the iPod. Many were trashing Apple, saying that iRiver, Rios, etc would crush them. Apple wasn't exactly "cool" back then (outside the Mac userbase). As for MS "uncool stigma", visit any video game message board and you'll see countless posts from people saying they used to regard MS as "uncool" but Xbox changed their mind. Zune may build on that.
For me it's not about who has the most money. Who has the most clout in the industry. For me it's about using great products all around. Products that look great too. Apple has that. It garners passion, loyalty, and yes... sometimes love. Not that sort of love. Not the, I want to get in between the sheets with my sexy black MacBook kind of love. But Mac users (some of them) love their machines. Microsoft doesn't have that. Look at the old Mac 1984 Superbowl commercial (http://youtube.com/watch?v=jEI4XRfHSJo). The figure on the big screen and the grey drones in that commercial are Microsoft. Boring, slow and uninspiring.
If people are happy living their lives using second (or third) best products, and maybe just because it's the biggest seller out there, then that's fine. I want more than second best.
hehehehehehhe... keep talking.. this is frigging hilarious
Sorry to pick on you guys.. they don't call it the MS XBOX for a reason..
MS is for business software. Xbox is for games. Get it?
And, I mean, brown? Come on...
Sam Collins, on the other hand, seems to have never heard the word 'antitrust.' Sounds like he thinks Microsoft is God and prays to it every night. There are definitely anticompetitive behaviors Microsoft can't engage in.
Diego, there was a recent article in the NYT about the trend of people taking their laptops to bed with them. I'll wager they were Macs-:).
Rahrens is simply. . .right.
As for the link to the Zune blogger, it is notable only for the fact that the fellow doesn't actually say much of anything at all. Maybe he is afraid of Microsoft.