-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2007/07/02/a-real-world-troll-story/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
2 weeks ago · 181 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
3 days ago · 24 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
2 days ago · 8 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
A lot of forum and digg trolls are paid. It's pathetic but there it is. Remember the E3 crowd that MS paid to cross their arms in an X and cheer for Xbox? The same thing happens on digg and other services.
There are professional trolls you can pay to do this.
If they went as far as to get up in your face and stuff, I bet they got a hefty reward.
No one could possibly say the N95 is a better device than the iPhone -- not and be taken seriously -- unless they made it clear they heavily weighted their rating on the camera functionality of both devices. No one would dispute that if a camera is the absolute highest priority the N95 was practically made for you. Not just over the iPhone, but likely all other smartphones as well. But I've mentioned before I think the market for smartphone users who require a killer camera is pretty small.
Translation: I don't have the $700 to spend and the local store is sold out anyway.
Actually the fellow, Ricky Something, made a half-dozen videos, claiming that the N95 bests the iPhones in various ways. He's been reasonably polite when he is here, but tells lies and encourages trolling on other sites. After all, he makes his living off the Symbian/Nokia bread train.
I have no problem acknowledging that the camera in the N95 is better than the one in the iPhone. However, the claim that the N95 is a better convergence device overall is laughable.
I haven't used the iPhone, so I really can't compare it to the N95. It has a fatal flaw in my perspective though: the touchscreen.
I looks pretty and can be spectacular (and let's face it, Apple is good in that). In everyday use however (95 % percent of the tasks you do with your phone) joystick and buttons used with one hand is easier and faster way to do it.
Anyway, this is my thinking without having tried out the iPhone.
Let the communication continue..:)
This trolling is not only limited to computers. Cars, sports teams, cities/states/countries, who has the best Potassium, etc.
I was under the impression that the two browsers should be very close (except for the touch interface) .... since they both have the same Javascript and KHTML core.
I also was given the Nokia for free by PureMobile, so if I decide to get rid of it I’ll give it to one of my readers"
If you were smart you would
A. sign up for a different ebay account
B. sell the N95
C. use the money to purchase the iPhone.
D. tell puremobile you gave it to a reader in the unlikely occurance that they ask.
-Since we're clearing up lies...
1. Howardforums is not a Symbian/Nokia site. It's a mobile phone forum, complete with an Apple forum.
2. I most certainly do not "make a living" on my site. I can assure you that the ad revenue wouldn't even pay my cellphone bill.
3. I don't encourage trolling anywhere.
4. I certainly don't iPhone-bash. I do, however, point out where marketing is in over their head (as an ad sales rep, it's easy to see things like that) and will point out where a specific device fails or suffers. If you're such an "avid" reader of my site, you'll also see that when the N95 was launched, I was very quick to say the reasons that I didn't think it would be a good purchase.
After I was given one, I did an objective review and found that it was still lacking in the areas where it lacks, and said so.
There's a big difference in all-out bashing and in simply pointing out weaknesses. Robert hasn't bashed the N95 (that I've heard/read) but simply pointed out areas in which he thinks that the iPhone is better.
I won't sit here and argue iPhone vs. N95 on Robert's blog. I just want to clear up lies that are being said about me.
Walking past many of those waiting in line on our way to work - you know you'd better not mess around
Interesting and I think I will tell one of my former professors about this as he wrote a book called the "Sacred Santa" that explores how consumerism is becoming a religion in of itself. Not saying what you did was a "religous" experience but to some it could be seen as such.
This is a subject that cannot be covered in a comment on a blog so I am not tryign to cover all the bases here. Basically, I wanted to let you know that I DO UNDERSTAND Robert.
Feel sorry that you had to deal with trolls.
--Mike
Is it really impossible to form a barrier against trolls online? Sounds like a potential business opportunity.
With all of this hype, I'm wondering if the iPhone will really deliver over time.
Neigther the iPhone nor the N95 are any really good value for the crazy expensive prices that they cost.
Nokia is 750$ (+ subscription?)
iPhone is 600$ (+ 1440$ - 2400$ 24-month subscription contract)
Given the fact that neigther are going to last any more than a few months, those are both not to recommend anyone else than someone who has no problems paying a lot of money for a product that is not going to last.
In my opinion the killer feature that will be usefull in the longer term, provide the good reason to invest more than into a 10$ pre-paid phone, that's when the Archos 605 WiFi or the N800 will be comming with VOIP on WiFi, HSDPA and later WiMax.
If your device comes with 2G data service, then you might as well get a 10$ pre-paid clamshell phone with virginmobile or something like that which will give you the same use.
Though when there will be 800x480 4" screen products with PC-like Opera browser experience, with full Flash and Javascript support, and providing free unlimited worldwide VOIP and IM using all of WiFi, HSDPA and WiMax, then those are gonna be the revolutionnary product.
Thus far iPhone and N95 are not revolutionary, they are simply temporary flashy bricks for rich kids and misguided early adopters.
If you're going to troll at least write a decent flame. My 13-year-old can flame better than that and he'll sign his name to it, too!
And lots of us have expensive devices that aren't the iPhone. Treos, Razrs, Blackberries, SmartPhones, all cost more than $400 when first released. That's not too much different than the iPhone's price.
As a PHONE, they might not be worth $600-700, but you're not taking into account everything else:
MP3 Player - ~$200
digital camera - ~$250-300
GPS unit ~$350-400
And that's not even counting the internet browsing and all that. So I could either buy all these things separate, and look like Batman walking around with a utility belt, or I can have ONE device to slip quietly in my pocket.
Robert, have you heard of this story?
But, I digress...
When I think of trolling, particularly technology zealotry, I think of someone posting something to get a rise out of the forum which is clearly a certain way that is different than the troll. (I'm a Mac and I'm a PC)
So let's look at the two situations and you tell me where they are not similar:
Nokia guy goes to an iPhone line and stirs up trouble. His main intent is to to prove that the company he likes, and by extension, he, is better than you since your waiting for an Apple product, and Nokia's products are superior.
Or, *the* Apple guy goes up to an MS guy and stirs up trouble. It is obvious Steve's main intent was to prove that his company, and by extension, he, was better that you since you worked for MS, and Apple's products are superior.
Now I agree that this in your face confrontations are uncalled for, especially over what is just a phone. Although extreme, it is the same as wearing a Red Sox cap to a Yankees game, arguing on the Internet, or in an extreme form, bombing an abortion clinic. Different means, same type of behavior.
Hey Robert, one thing this Nokia vs. Apple debate has sparked, is that I have had no clue about the Nokia before, and now I'm seriously considering one. I have no experience on either device and I've witnessed more conversation, flaming, fanboys, and propaganda spewing from both iPhone and N95 people. So I'm coming at this from scratch.
Kinda tough being an informed consumer in spite of how religious the information is.
That said, labeling Nokia owners as trolls because of the ill advised comments of a few is a bit harsh. A difference of opinion does not indicate that someone is trolling. There are some very valid points made in terms of what the iPhone doesn't do in the previous topic.
Ultimately our preferences are individual. If it were any other way then life would be intolerably boring.
What is that law about for every positive reaction there is an equal and opposite negative reaction??? I'll have to bone up on my physics/chemistry before saying that's 100% accurate.
Thanks.
P.S. In case you're interested, the post is here: http://www.istudioweb.com/puppets-and-puppeteer...