-
Website
http://www.scobleizer.com/ -
Original page
http://scobleizer.com/2007/06/25/scobles-silly-facebooker-says/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
danja
44 comments · 4 points
-
polizeros
52 comments · 1 points
-
AndyBeard
69 comments · 4 points
-
Zachary Adam Cohen
35 comments · 8 points
-
dbarefoot
40 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
1 day ago · 22 comments
-
World-brand-building mistakes France’s entrepreneurs make
1 week ago · 181 comments
-
2010: the year SEO isn’t important anymore
1 week ago · 67 comments
-
A new addition here: the Meebo bar
1 day ago · 7 comments
-
iPhone developers abandoning app model for HTML5?
1 week ago · 52 comments
-
The best and worst thing Twitter did in 2009: RT
50% of my friends on facebook, i never met them, i added them after seeing their profiles, as I was trying to drive contributors to write for my blog http://www.facebookism.com and many of them accepted to do it with pleasure and i am sure more and more will also accept.
Many interesting people are out there ... so lets be friends on facebook or on any other social networking site.
But I have two points of clarification:
1) You're a man. You're not going to have random, creepy guys stalking you on Facebook. I feel like I have to be on guard against that, which is why I'm really careful about the information people can see in my profile.
2) For me, Facebook is a tool I've used for years to keep in touch with close friends who scattered after college. Now, I have a whole host of people that I know in other contexts who I am friends with on Facebook and I'd like to keep the information they see about me within that context.
I wish there were a way to create a "professional profile" so that I can share some information with people I know in a social setting and some information with people that I know in a business setting.
I wonder if Facebook is working on that.
I wonder if Facebook is working on that.
It's called LinkedIn.
Anyway I agree that would be a good idea to do, have two separate Facebook personas maybe? One with your home email, one with your work?
Here's a link: http://www.russellheimlich.com/blog/operator-11...
I was Facebook friends with many of the admissions officers at schools I was considering applying to last year, for example... and even now, I do mix them up a little bit, between business and pleasure. Mine is more multi-purpose than some.
At least my wife was there. Heheh. http://www.flickr.com/photos/jdlasica/101847350...
Facebook's privacy policy always icks me out a bit. It used to be a little bit contradictory in places, :\
But it demonstrates that you can get gainful employment, even after taking your shirt off at an industry party!
Anyway, seriously, there's no such thing as privacy anymore, is there? What you all trying to hide?!?
I don't think I subscribed to your blog right away, but the real hook for me was your Photowalking series. I love photography, and the look into how Thomas takes pictures was inspiring.
It is not, nor has it ever been, possible for you to see someone's profile based solely on the fact that you have a mutual facebook friend. The only choices you have relate to your network. All of your networks, some of them (you can specify, I think), and only your friends.
So if folks are poking around trying to find a "Don't show this to my friends' friends" they're going to be looking for a looooong time.
Robert... For those of us not able to attend Gnomedex, would you be willing to post your points on this topica after the fact?
To be sure, I understand the value of bringing your audience closer using a social network ... but I'd like to hear your perspective, and won't be at the conference.
Oh, and when I send emails from my personal account, my signature includes links to my profiles on MySpace, Facebook, and LinkedIn... I suppose with Friendster building more page views I will need to add that link as well (my first, now-unused, social network).
I appreciate you for showing the world how the web could be if we were to embrace the connectedness it truly allows for. Keep on keepin on!
Regards,
Joe Bruzzese
Within 20 minutes of reading your blog, we had connected in facebook and had moved past the icebreaker.
Now once we agree on whether all friends should be accepted or only after a non facebook related icebreaker (an IM message, an email), we can move onto sorting out world peace.
Both viewpoints have merit, but i still buy into my way of facebook "virtual contacts" accepting which is i think i should have an idea of why i have accepted someone as my facebook contact (they actually tell me a piece of information which proves they're REAL "company they work for, industry they're in, sport they're interested in" - SOMETHING).
[Yours is that as someone reads your blog they're connected to you through that, but that seems to be a 1 way connection rather than a 2 way connection, as they know you, but you don't know anything about them.]
Now about that 22 hour flight to actually have a face to face conversation...
Hoo boy! Joe, I am NOT a naysayer. I've just been using Facebook for a while and I'm starting to see that its purpose has changed a lot. I guess I'm going to have to reevaluate how I use it.
"It is not, nor has it ever been, possible for you to see someone’s profile based solely on the fact that you have a mutual facebook friend.">
Pete, I dunno how long you've been on Facebook. But I do vividly remember this privacy setting existing at some point in time. I'll have to ask some of the people I know from Facebook if my memory is flawed or not on that one. I'm certainly willing to admit I'm wrong, if I am in fact, wrong. But I'm pretty sure I'm not.
"But it demonstrates that you can get gainful employment, even after taking your shirt off at an industry party!
Anyway, seriously, there’s no such thing as privacy anymore, is there? What you all trying to hide?!?"
Robert, I wonder if you'd say that about me. I've been asking that question for some time. If I took my shirt off at an industry party, would I still be respected inside or outside the world of technology the next morning?
Perhaps things have changed more than I realized, but it used to be that any hint of sexuality from a woman in the workforce was an automatic strike against her. I've tested that limit to be sure. I've posted photos and videos of myself frolicking in bikinis on YouTube, FB and even *shudder* MySpace. And so far, I haven't met with any pushback or obvious judgment. But I'm curious to see whether it will ever bite me in the ass.
I've posted more about my thoughts on this subject. Check it out if you're interested!
On signing up they almost immediately asked me to enter credit card information (why I would want to do this I don't know, as I declined, and no reasons were given for me to enter it in the first place).
They also wanted me to pick a "region", but really forced me to pick a city (not the same as a region) and the closest choice was thirty minute drive from here. Last night as I was updating my profile it warned me that all of this info was available to anyone else who had picked this city as their "region".
Anybody could, I guess pick various cities as a way to snoop around on strangers profiles. I decided to try using my old college as a network instead, as I'd probably have more in common with that group than the residents of this distant city. Oh, no, can't do that unless you have an e-mail address at the college. Huh?
One thing I Do like about it is the "light" interface that would probably work even on a dial-up link. Not nearly the clutter of Myspace. I'll probably keep my Facebook ID even though I won't use it all that much, unlike my Myspace test which I deleted after the first day.
Really, people should err on the side of caution when it comes to giving out personal details. To encourage people who may not know the risks to do otherwise is irresponsible.
A few systems such as this have established themselves as "mainstream", but what do we really know about their hiring practices for the people who run their data centers? Have they had background checks etc? One of these days we'll see a headline that some social networking site has been completely harvested from inside and the rules will suddenly change for what "makes sense". I think I'll stay on the bleeding edge of this curve, with no apologies to those who want to be universally connected.